+1 (non-binding) I am also a +1 to evaluating the KIP process and ways to make it more effective and streamlined.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Liquan Pei <liquan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava < > > e...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if > > possible, > > > > and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to > > > just > > > > kick off voting on this KIP immediately (and restart it if someone > > raises > > > > an issue). Feel free to object and comment in the DISCUSS thread if > you > > > > feel there's something to still be discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-51+-+List+Connectors+REST+API > > > > > > > > I'll obviously kick things off with a +1. > > > > > > > > -Ewen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Liquan Pei > > Department of Physics > > University of Massachusetts Amherst > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Neha > -- Grant Henke Software Engineer | Cloudera gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
