+1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Ismael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
; Hi, Ismael,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> &
t
>>>>>>> rejected alternative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ismael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Ismael Juma
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>
te:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> initiate
> > > the
> > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> traffic:
> > > >
I'll update the KIP.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ismael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 21 Dec 2016 10:53 pm, "Rajini Sivaram" >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>&
Dec 2016 10:53 pm, "Rajini Sivaram" >>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ismael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for the KIP. This is a very useful change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once you al
gt; Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would l
> > properties
> > > > > for each of the interfaces. To use SSL on internal and external
> > > networks,
> > > > > you would almost definitely want different keystores with different
> > > > > hostname/IP addresses. Similarly for SASL, you
t; you would almost definitely want different keystores with different
> > > > hostname/IP addresses. Similarly for SASL, you might want to enable
> > > > different mechanisms, use a different authentication server etc. This
> > is
> > > > listed under fu
> > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > As the dis
>
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> initiate
> > > the
> > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> traffic:
> > > >
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate
> > the
> > > voting proce
he
> > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
>
--
Thanks,
Neha
Hi, Ismael,
Thanks for the KIP. +1
Jun
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
> voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
>
> https://cwiki.apa
; > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate
> the
> > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+Ext
Ismael,
Thank you for the KIP. It is a very useful feature.
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
> voting process for KIP-103: Separation of
Hi all,
As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
The vote will run for a minimum of
mael,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you for the KIP. This is a very useful change.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Once you allow multiple interfaces with the same security
>> protocol,
>> > you
>> > > > > w
Once you allow multiple interfaces with the same security protocol,
> > you
> > > > > will soon also need to be able to configure protocol-specific
> > > properties
> > > > > for each of the interfaces. To use SSL on internal and external
> > > ne
; > > > hostname/IP addresses. Similarly for SASL, you might want to enable
> > > > different mechanisms, use a different authentication server etc. This
> > is
> > > > listed under future work.But it may be worth thinking about what a
> > fully
> >
ture work.But it may be worth thinking about what a
> fully
> > > configurable 'label' looks like. Would every property now become a
> list/map
> > > like listeners - you would then end up with maps of lists for some
> > > properties. It will good if all pro
> properties. It will good if all properties corresponding to a label
> > including listener and advertised.listener are configured consistently - if
> > that is possible,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
- if
> that is possible,
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've posted "KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic" for
> > discussion:
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/conflu
up with maps of lists for some
properties. It will good if all properties corresponding to a label
including listener and advertised.listener are configured consistently - if
that is possible,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've posted "KIP
1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've posted "KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic" for
> discussion:
>
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> <h
Hi all,
We've posted "KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic" for
discussion:
*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-103%3A+Separation+of+Int
26 matches
Mail list logo
