+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Since a few people (including myself) felt that listener name was clearer > than protocol label, I updated the KIP to use that (as mentioned in the > discuss thread). Given that this is a minor change, I don't think we need > to restart the vote. If anyone objects to this change, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Ismael > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Looks good. +1 (non-binding). > > > > What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"? > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, Ismael, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to > > initiate > > > > the > > > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External > > traffic: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic > > > > > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Neha > > >
