Thanks a lot for help out, Ismael. I was wondering why you changed some of
the fix version back to 0.9.1.0 and now I understand.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> I also changed the "Fix version" for a number of recent JIRAs from 0.10.0.0
> to
I also changed the "Fix version" for a number of recent JIRAs from 0.10.0.0
to 0.9.1.0. The reason is that once we rename the JIRA versions (as per
KAFKA-3276), they will all automatically become 0.10.0.0 (without causing a
storm of notifications).
Ismael
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Ismael
Thank you Becket. I have:
* Updated KIP wiki page so that all KIPs with a target of 0.9.1.0 now
target 0.10.0.0
* Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3275 to track tasks
that still need to be done. The next step would be to update JIRA versions
as per https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Thanks everyone for voting.
The vote has passed with +6 (binding) and +5(non-binding)
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Harsha wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 02:25 PM, Christian Posta wrote:
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Gwen Shapira
+1
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 02:25 PM, Christian Posta wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM
+1 non binding
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Becket Qin
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We would like to start this voting thre
+1
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> > 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
> >
> > The next Kafka release will
+1.
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
>
> The next Kafka release will have several significant important new
> features/changes such as Kafka Stream
+1.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Thanks for bringing up the compatibility and feature discussion.
>
> Ismael had similar concern about the short release interval between 0.9.0.0
> and 0.10.0.0.
>
> From wire protocol perspective, the old clients should still
Hi Grant,
Thanks for bringing up the compatibility and feature discussion.
Ismael had similar concern about the short release interval between 0.9.0.0
and 0.10.0.0.
>From wire protocol perspective, the old clients should still work well with
the brokers in 0.10.0.0. So it is backward compatible.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
>
> The next Kafka release will have several significant important new
> features/changes such as Kafka Stream, Me
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I agree with Grant on getting KIP-4 into this release if it's possible.
> There are a lot of tools which depend on it.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
+1 (non-binding)
I agree with Grant on getting KIP-4 into this release if it's possible.
There are a lot of tools which depend on it.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Ismael
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Ismael
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> > 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
> >
> > The ne
+1 (non-binding)
Ismael
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
>
> The next Kafka release will have several significant important new
> features/changes such as Kafka
+1 (non-binding) In general I am for this, but wanted to discuss a few
things:
*Compatibility*
Given the (theoretically) short time period between this release and 0.9. I
suggest we make this release as compatible as possible. Especially from the
client perspective. Other open source projects (Sp
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
> 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
>
> The next Kafka release will have several significant important new
> features/changes such as Kafka Stream, Mes
Hi All,
We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka release
0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0.
The next Kafka release will have several significant important new
features/changes such as Kafka Stream, Message Format Change, Client
Interceptors and several new consumer API changes, et
18 matches
Mail list logo
