Hi Grant, Thanks for bringing up the compatibility and feature discussion.
Ismael had similar concern about the short release interval between 0.9.0.0 and 0.10.0.0. >From wire protocol perspective, the old clients should still work well with the brokers in 0.10.0.0. So it is backward compatible. However, from programming interface perspective, there might be some backward incompatible changes on client side in order to enable new features. I agree we should try to avoid those changes as much as possible. Feature wise, I believe rack awareness is also something ranking high on the wishlist. After all, given all the new features we have already had, I think 0.10.0.0 is a justifiable major release. Thanks, Jiangjie (Becket) Qin On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I agree with Grant on getting KIP-4 into this release if it's possible. > > There are a lot of tools which depend on it. > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > We would like to start this voting thread on making next Kafka > release > > > > 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0. > > > > > > > > The next Kafka release will have several significant important new > > > > features/changes such as Kafka Stream, Message Format Change, Client > > > > Interceptors and several new consumer API changes, etc. We feel it is > > > > better to make next Kafka release 0.10.0.0 instead of 0.9.1.0. > > > > > > > > Some previous discussions are in the following thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201602.mbox/%3ccabtagwfzigx1frzd020vk9fanj0s9nkszfuwk677bqxfuuc...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Ashish >
