Thanks for the update, Niket. LGTM.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 3:43 AM Niket Goel wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking a look Gouzhang.
> That is an accurate summary of the changes.
>
> - Niket
>
> > On Jun 13, 2022, at 2:19 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hello Niket,
> >
> > I took a look at the diffs o
Thanks for taking a look Gouzhang.
That is an accurate summary of the changes.
- Niket
> On Jun 13, 2022, at 2:19 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> Hello Niket,
>
> I took a look at the diffs of the wiki page history and it seems the
> updates are:
>
> 1) Removing the topic name from QuorumInfo.
>
Hello Niket,
I took a look at the diffs of the wiki page history and it seems the
updates are:
1) Removing the topic name from QuorumInfo.
2) Making ReplicaState public APIs more aligned with existing ones.
3) Renaming from DescribeQuorumResult to DescribeMetadataQuorumResult.
Is that all? If ye
Hi all,
An update on KIP-836; while iterating on the PR some finer details in the
naming of the API handler and related classes in the Admin Client has changed.
I have updated the KIP with the changes. Please provide any feedback you may
have on the changes made.
PR - https://github.com/apache/
+1 (binding).
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:52 AM Niket Goel wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the feedback on this. KIP-836 was approved with
> 3 binding votes from Luke, David Arthur and David Jacot.
> - Niket
>
> > On May 20, 2022, at 11:44 PM, David Jacot wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks
Thanks everyone for the feedback on this. KIP-836 was approved with
3 binding votes from Luke, David Arthur and David Jacot.
- Niket
> On May 20, 2022, at 11:44 PM, David Jacot wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> David
>
> Le ven. 20 mai 2022 à 21:08, David Arthur a écrit :
>
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
David
Le ven. 20 mai 2022 à 21:08, David Arthur a écrit :
> Hey Niket, +1 (binding) from me.
>
> -David
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:07 PM José Armando García Sancio
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Niket,
> >
> > I took a look at the latest KIP. It looks like QuorumInfo.R
Hey Niket, +1 (binding) from me.
-David
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:07 PM José Armando García Sancio
wrote:
> Hey Niket,
>
> I took a look at the latest KIP. It looks like QuorumInfo.ReplicaState
> is missing the RPC fields added by this PR. Is the plan to return them
> to the Admin Client? E.g.
Hey Niket,
I took a look at the latest KIP. It looks like QuorumInfo.ReplicaState
is missing the RPC fields added by this PR. Is the plan to return them
to the Admin Client? E.g. it is missing LastFetchTimestamp and
LastCaughtUpTimestamp.
For those fields what will the admin client return when th
Hi Niket,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding) from me.
Luke
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 8:27 AM deng ziming
wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Thanks for this KIP.
> --
> Best,
> Ziming
>
> > On May 17, 2022, at 1:14 AM, Niket Goel
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for KIP-836:
+1(non-binding)
Thanks for this KIP.
--
Best,
Ziming
> On May 17, 2022, at 1:14 AM, Niket Goel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for KIP-836:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-836%3A+Addition+of+Information+in+DescribeQuorumResponse+about+Voter+Lag
>
>
+1 Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:14 AM Niket Goel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for KIP-836:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-836%3A+Addition+of+Information+in+DescribeQuorumResponse+about+Voter+Lag
>
> Thanks
> Niket Goel
>
Hi all,
I would like to start a vote for KIP-836:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-836%3A+Addition+of+Information+in+DescribeQuorumResponse+about+Voter+Lag
Thanks
Niket Goel
13 matches
Mail list logo
