+1 (binding). On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:52 AM Niket Goel <ng...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > Thanks everyone for the feedback on this. KIP-836 was approved with > 3 binding votes from Luke, David Arthur and David Jacot. > - Niket > > > On May 20, 2022, at 11:44 PM, David Jacot <da...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > David > > > > Le ven. 20 mai 2022 à 21:08, David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > >> Hey Niket, +1 (binding) from me. > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:07 PM José Armando García Sancio > >> <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Hey Niket, > >>> > >>> I took a look at the latest KIP. It looks like QuorumInfo.ReplicaState > >>> is missing the RPC fields added by this PR. Is the plan to return them > >>> to the Admin Client? E.g. it is missing LastFetchTimestamp and > >>> LastCaughtUpTimestamp. > >>> > >>> For those fields what will the admin client return when the RPC > >>> version doesn't support those features? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> -José > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> David Arthur > >> >
-- -José
