a...@harsha.io
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted
> to
> > > > > address
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes
> >Can you restart the voting thread.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha
> > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope
> of
> > > > > KIP-43
> > >
> is
> > > > > > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > &
L+enhancements
> > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP?
> > > > > > >
ou,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajini
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <
> > > g...@confl
; > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <
> > g...@confluent.io
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Harsha,
> > > > > > > > >
gt; >
> > > > > > > > Harsha,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind
> jumping
> > > into
> > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me
elp me understand the decision
> behind
> > > the
> > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and
> > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while
> > > > Rajini
> > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I r
gle Login and
> > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while
> > > Rajini
> > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful.
> Perhaps
> > > > > > (since we have similar experience wi
gt; > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see
> > > > > what I am missing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gwen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha wrote:
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, M
+1 (non-binding) on the revised KIP
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:21:14 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
> From: rajinisiva...@googlemail.com
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>
> Gwen,
>
> Is it still possible to
can help me see
> > > > what I am missing.
> > > >
> > > > Gwen
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha wrote:
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM
t;>
> > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield <
> > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
33 Andrew Schofield <
> > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
>
; +1 (non-binding)
> >> >
> >> > ----------------
> >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
> >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +
> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
> >>
>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield <
>> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> >
>> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
>> > > Date: Mon, 7 M
gt; > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:3
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield <
andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
> > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE
+1 (non-binding)
> From: ism...@juma.me.uk
> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajin
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL
> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to support
> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be inte
It will be good to get the SASL enhancements into 0.10.0.0 if possible.
There are no outstanding questions related to the KIP and the PR is ready
for review.
Feedback is appreciated.
Thank you...
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I would
I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL
enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to support
new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different
authentication servers.
The KIP is available here for reference:
https://cwiki.apache.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
