Harsha, Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while Rajini is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see what I am missing.
Gwen On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > ---------------------------------------- >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +0000 >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to >> > support >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different >> > >> authentication servers. >> > >> >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements >> > >> >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Thank you... >> > >> >> > >> Regards, >> > >> >> > >> Rajini >> > >> >> >
