Gwen, Ah, I clearly don't know the rules. So it looks like it would not really be possible to get this into 0.10.0.0 after all.
Rajini On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Rajini, > > I think the vote didn't pass yet? > If I can see correctly, Harsha and I are the only committers who voted, so > we are missing a 3rd vote. > > Gwen > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Gwen, > > > > Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR review. If any > > of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR over the > > weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping them too. > > > > Many thanks. > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > This can be discussed in the review. > > > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets > > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 > > has > > > > been > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated > > KIP > > > > is > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind > jumping > > > into > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision > > behind > > > > the > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and > while > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help > me > > > see > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +0000 > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: > > > Kafka > > > > > > SASL > > > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL > implementation > > > in > > > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated > > with > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing > > > list: > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > -- Regards, Rajini
