Cool. Thank you all for comments and participation.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Yes. Thanks for driving this.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
>
> > There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the
> proposal
> > accepted?
> >
Yes. Thanks for driving this.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
> There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the proposal
> accepted?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Joel Koshy wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 A
There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the proposal
accepted?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Joel Koshy wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Ja
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> >
> > > Allen,
> > >
> > > Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1
>
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Allen,
> >
> > Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1
> >
> > Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote on it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Allen,
>
> Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1
>
> Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote on it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Allen Wang wrote:
>
> > I would like to call for a
Allen,
Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1
Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote on it?
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Allen Wang wrote:
> I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment.
>
> The latest proposal is at
>
> http
+1 (binding)
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/132/files#diff-5d4a4a97554d3ac24efe68d98eb27b64L63
I like the CLI implementation and general purpose of it, looks like a great
way to set attribute/strings on brokers and some more stuff to-do I think
before this hits trunk but overall we should wo
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
> I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment.
>
> The latest proposal is at
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-36
> +Rack+aware+replica+assignment
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment.
The latest proposal is at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-36
+Rack+aware+replica+assignment
Thanks,
Allen
13 matches
Mail list logo
