There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the proposal accepted?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Aditya Auradkar < > aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman > > > > > <okara...@linkedin.com.invalid > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Allen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote > on > > > it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Allen Wang < > allenxw...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware > replica > > > > > > > assignment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The latest proposal is at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-36 > > > > > > > > +Rack+aware+replica+assignment > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Allen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Grant Henke > > > Software Engineer | Cloudera > > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke > > > > > >
