Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Vahid,
Thanks for the KIP. I think we're mostly in violent agreement that the
lack
of any Write permissions on consumer groups is confusing. Unfortunately
it's a pretty annoying issue to fix since it
k, especially from some of
> the committers, on the KIP and on the note below.
>
> Thanks.
> --Vahid
>
>
>
>
> From: "Vahid S Hashemian"
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Cc: "Kafka User"
> Date: 06/21/2017 12:49 PM
> Subject:
[DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
I appreciate everyone's feedback so far on this KIP.
Before starting a vote, I'd like to also ask for feedback on the
"Additional Food for Thought" section in the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/
"Kafka User"
Date: 06/08/2017 11:29 AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Hi all,
I'm resending my earlier note hoping it would spark some conversation this
time around :)
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: "Vahid S Hash
).
So, a consumer would be required to have (Topic, Read), (Group, Write)
ACLs in order to function.
--Vahid
From: Colin McCabe
To: us...@kafka.apache.org
Date: 06/19/2017 11:01 AM
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Thanks
, Read), (Group, Write)
ACLs in order to function.
--Vahid
From: Colin McCabe
To: us...@kafka.apache.org
Date: 06/19/2017 11:01 AM
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Thanks for the explanation. I still think it would be
; >>
> >> On 12/06/17 18:47, Vahid S Hashemian wrote:
> >> Hi Colin,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the feedback.
> >>
> >> To be honest, I'm not sure either why Read was selected instead of Write
> >> for mutating APIs in the initia
gt; --Vahid
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Michal Borowiecki
>> To:us...@kafka.apache.org, Vahid S Hashemian <
>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com>, dev@kafka.apache.org
>> Date:06/13/2017 01:35 AM
>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS]
wiecki
> To:us...@kafka.apache.org, Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com>, dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 06/13/2017 01:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
> Permission of OffsetFetch
> ---
Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Hi Vahid,
+1 wrt OffsetFetch.
The "Additional Food for Thought" mentions Heartbeat as a non-mutating
action. I don't think that's true as the GroupCoordinator updates the
latestHeartbeat field
:11 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL
Permission of OffsetFetch
Hi Vahid,
I think you make a valid point that the ACLs controlling group
operations are not very intuitive.
This is probably a dumb question, but why are we using Read for mutating
APIs? Shou
Hi all,
I'm resending my earlier note hoping it would spark some conversation this
time around :)
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: "Vahid S Hashemian"
To: dev , "Kafka User"
Date: 05/30/2017 08:33 AM
Subject:KIP-163: Lower the Minimum Required ACL Permission of
OffsetFetch
Hi,
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
