which implementation of JAX-RS would you use? Tomcat doesn't bring
one, and Jersey is quite big, so it shouldn't go into the wiki, should
it?
One usecase would be to collect on a wiki page things from a tablet or
the mobile, urls, text snippets or fotos.
I had once played with a servlet to do thi
Is there still a usecase for weblog?
I have one, similar but different: share text, images or urls from the
smartphone to a wiki page.
Am Sa., 7. Dez. 2024 um 22:28 Uhr schrieb Murray Altheim :
>
> Hi Juan Pablo,
>
> I do think the world has largely moved on from XML-RPC, so
> losing it wouldn't
Actually I never understood the need for get/setters anyway (course I know
the book). C++ got along well without.
Cheers
Murray Altheim schrieb am Di., 9. Aug. 2022, 16:12:
> On 2022/08/09 22:55, Jürgen Weber wrote:
> > Java 11 would be OK. Not more. Enterprises are very con
Java 11 would be OK. Not more. Enterprises are very conservative.
Also, I do not see why a mature product like JSPWiki should be
refactored to use newer Java features.
Cheers,
Juergen
Am Di., 9. Aug. 2022 um 15:10 Uhr schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As noted some days ago,
The issues in Jira should not get lost, neither the closed ones. It is
important history.
A quick search finds some migration scripts:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31125655/is-there-a-way-to-import-jira-issues-to-github
https://gist.github.com/graemerocher/ee99ddef8d0e201f0615
and Spring
Hi,
part of the appeal of JSPWiki is for me that I can reach deep into the
wiki engine from plugins.
JSPWiki is for hackers, BigCorps use Confluence.
And as hacker I want control, I need to look into the Wiki core and
use what it offers, or work around its limitations.
So I'd rather prefer no API
Apache licensed, Murray's plugins should fit fine into the
org.apache.wiki.plugin package ..
Cheers, Juergen
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 05:25 Uhr schrieb Murray Altheim
:
>
> Hello.
>
> It's been awhile since I've been involved in the project and I'm not
> sure if I'm even still on the committer's l
Hello dev,
JSPWiki is currently at web-app version="2.5"
What about going forward to 3.0 ?
This would give native multipart/form-data handling.
All non-retired Tomcat, Jetty, Weblogic or WebSphere versions support
Servlet 3.0
Greetings,
Juergen
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/g
+1
2018-02-10 1:37 GMT+01:00 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez :
> Hi all,
>
> this is a release vote for Apache JSPWiki, version 2.10.3. The vote
> will be open for at least 72 hours from now.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
You are right though, a better front end UI for mobile would be valuable.
>> But I guess I'm more of a backend developer and curious whether anyone has
>> any thoughts on the roadmap for back end?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David V
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi,
right now you have the choice of several products to run JSPWiki: Tomcat,
Jetty, Wildfly, Weblogic and Websphere (liberty). WildFly Swarm even gives
you a full application if you prefer microservices. I do not see anything
in Spring that we don't already have.
A far more important missing fea
03.09.2017 09:27 schrieb "Siegfried Goeschl" <
siegfried.goes...@it20one.com>:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> did you also look at CPU usage?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
> > On 1 Sep 2017, at 18:40, Jürgen Weber wrote:
> >
> > Ran
:
> It would surely be interesting to see what the performance difference would
> be.
>
> We could also ditch CachingProvider then probably?
> And remove some code complexity...
>
> Grtz.
> Harry
>
> Op 29 aug. 2017 12:07 a.m. schreef "Jürgen Weber" :
>
>>
Hi,
ehcache-2.8.3.jar takes about a third of the JSPWiki.war size.
Is it worth it?
As for Filesystem page providers, the OS filesystem satisfies all caching needs.
ehCaching is only useful for DB or the Subversion providers, but who uses them?
As for caching rendered pages, this only works for
Hi,
Spamfilter won't let me change page=Configuration, so would someone
please add a documentation line to jspwiki.shortURLConstructor.prefix
:
# This prefix must be in some elements of web.xml, too: in
servlet-mapping of WikiServlet, in filter-mapping of WikiJSPFilter
Some for jspwiki-war/src/
Hi,
jspwiki-wiki.apache.org looks great on a computer screen.
Less so on a cell phone.
Left menu is unreadable. Top menu goes out of screen first.
Please do check with Chrome - developer options - device toolbar - iPhone 6
So, I do think next task for JSPWiki is mobile. Bring JSPWiki into the
Hi,
I am for git, too.
But is there an apache.org repository?
Cheers,
Juergen
2016-08-19 18:36 GMT+02:00 Harry Metske :
> Hi all,
>
> how would anyone feel if we migrated our jspwiki codebase from svn to git
> (github or somewhere else in the apache domain) ?
>
> I have a strong preference for g
2016-02-02 16:53 GMT+01:00 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
:
> - new skins for default template
have JSPWiki look better on smart phones would be great ..
Cheers,
Juergen
Hi,
how do you get the JSPWiki source into Eclipse Luna?
I tried File - import existing Maven project - and selected the toplevel
pom, this imports several projects, but Java files result not in the
package structure and one cannot navigate in the source.
Then I tried mvn eclipse:eclipse, but th
> >>>>
> >>>> As for now, we show an advice on the footer, stating that the content
> is
> >>>> AL; maybe we should reword that so it's made clearer, as it's seen on
> >>>> every
> >>>> page. If don't state t
Current release is 2.10.1, development goes to 2.10.2 (can somebody please
document that on
http://jspwiki.apache.org/development/source_and_guide.html?).
3.0 made too many changes at once, so it was decided to restart from 2.8
see these threads:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator
Just found out, that there is already an old Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-205
We should have a look at it, it already has attached sources.
Juergen
Hi JSPWiki Devs,
I wonder if it might make sense to write an encrypting Fileprovider.
This might be useful you run your wiki installation with a provider you
cannot trust, whose technicans could look at your filesystem.
SSL builds encryption between user's browser and the Wiki-VM, storage could
I'd like HTML 5 as default ..
Cheers, Jürgen
2014-07-13 13:20 GMT+02:00 Florian Holeczek :
> Hi all,
>
> thinking about setting up a wiki with multimedia content, I came across
> the fact that JSPWiki is delivering pages as XHTML 1.0 strict.
> Unfortunately, this means that it's not easily poss
which companies offering services can get
> listed, e.g., : http://cxf.apache.org/commercial-cxf-offerings.html.
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
> On 07/08/2014 10:06 AM, Jürgen Weber wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/Wiki.jsp?page=ContributedPlugins
>>
>
Hi,
https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/Wiki.jsp?page=ContributedPlugins
says nothing about the license of contributed plugins.
Shouldn't we add a notice to the page that plugin contributors should put
their plugins under Apache license or another Open Source license?
I think code contributed to an
ding
> the website, I only see the "Mailing lists" page "transferable" to the
> wiki; other than that, the rest of the website pages make sense to me if
> the remain on the website, WDYT?
>
>
> br,
> juan pablo
>
>
> [#1]: http://incubator.apache
-wiki.a.o are not well-formed though, and will fix them
> this afternoon/tonight.
>
> Am I missing something else?
>
>
> thanks + br,
> juan pablo
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Jürgen Weber wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Also you might update the Project status on the Apache JSPWiki page.
> >
> > Juergen
> >
>
Congratulations!
Also you might update the Project status on the Apache JSPWiki page.
Juergen
Enable Container Security in web.xml and recreate the war.
In WebSphere console - Users and Groups create users and groups Wikiuser
and Wikiadmin.
Put jspwiki-custom.properties into WebSphere/AppServer-8.5/classes
Deploy the war via console. In the war's Detail Properties - Security role
to user/gr
otherwise.
> >
> > I'll try to update our Wiki for this -- https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.
> > org/Wiki.jsp?page=Documentation, right now for some reason I haven't
> > write access. :/
> >
> > Finally, in our JSPWiki source code we have an integrated test for CM
ts will take over otherwise.
> >
> > I'll try to update our Wiki for this -- https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.
> > org/Wiki.jsp?page=Documentation, right now for some reason I haven't
> > write access. :/
> >
> > Finally, in our JSPWiki source code we have
My steps to get jspwiki-2.10.1-rc1 running with container managed auth:
explode the war to /projekte/jspwiki-2.10.1-rc1/JSPWiki
add
/projekte/apache-tomcat-8.0.8/conf/Catalina/localhost/JSPWiki.xml
change
/projekte/apache-tomcat-8.0.8/conf/server.xml
in web.xml enabled CONTAINER-M
+1
Am 25.05.2014 19:38 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
> This is a release vote for Apache JSPWiki, version 2.10.1. The vote will be
> open for at least 72 hours from now.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.
+1
Am 16.05.2014 02:02 schrieb "Glen Mazza" :
> I'm opposed to this, and would still like to see whatever Facebook page we
> presently have taken down/deleted. Janne is not on the team anymore, per
> his own choice, and he shouldn't be creating additional social media sites
> that are just going
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Harry Metske >wrote:
>
> > Jürgen,
> >
> > I haven' t.
> > And BTW, the attachment is not there, I think the list does not accept
> > attachments.
> >
> > regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
Hi,
has anybody tried to make wiki pages look better on small mobile screens?
Is there a suitable css?
The attached screenshot is from Firefox on Android, the menu column and top
row buttons are a bit small, whereas the second screenshot from wikipedia
looks good.
Greetings, Juergen
For our company intranet JSPWiki it's very nice, that we can get users from
company LDAP (with Tomcat's JNDIRealm and an LDAP jspwiki.userdatabase).
Everybody may write, but has to login first.
Cheers, Juergen
Am 11.03.2014 00:10 schrieb "Siegfried Goeschl" :
> Hi folks,
>
> I started to prepare
on
>
> for details.
>
> Ichiro
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Jürgen Weber wrote:
>
> > Is there no more a jspwiki.properties in the war?
> >
> > Jürgen
> > Am 14.01.2014 23:09 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
> > j
Is there no more a jspwiki.properties in the war?
Jürgen
Am 14.01.2014 23:09 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
> This is a release vote for Apache JSPWiki, version 2.10.0. The vote will be
> open for at least 72 hours from now.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
; > case,
> > > > > the
> > > > > >>> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we
> > > release
> > > > > >>> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest
> > > > release,
&g
on time (probably
> before, but just in case..). WDYT? Other than that, I fully agree with your
> comments
>
>
> br,
> juan pablo
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jürgen Weber wrote:
>
> > JSPWIKI-303 (JSPWiki-API library creation) looks like a major chang
JSPWIKI-303 (JSPWiki-API library creation) looks like a major change, it
merits its own release.
I think first priority should be to get out the Apache JSP Wiki version. No
more changes, just release a working software.
People on the lookout for a wiki software will not chose the one without
relea
fixed...
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
>
>
> On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
> > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1 too
> > >
> > &g
t; have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0
>
> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on ASF's
> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT?
>
> br,
> juan pablo
> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" escr
sec - in org.apache.wiki.parser.MarkupParserTest
>> Running org.apache.wiki.plugin.CounterPluginTest
>> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 6, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.325
>> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.wiki.plugin.CounterPluginTest
>> testSimpleCount(org.a
Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a lot be
going on.
I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator.
Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
Cheers,
Juergen
47 matches
Mail list logo
