Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [4657112] needs to be handled

Changes may lead to failure were done by > - kcmvp > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=891036 > - alexey zinoviev > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=891032 > > - Here's a reminder of what contribu

Re: ApacheCon Europe 2019 talks which are relevant to Apache Ignite

Dear @myrle the link on my talk about ML is incorrect This is a correct link https://aceu19.apachecon.com/session/ensembles-ml-algorithms-and-distributed-online-machine-learning-apache-ignite-0 пт, 4 окт. 2019 г. в 19:59, Denis Magda : > Igniters, > > Is anybody planning to visit the event this

Re: Enabling the checkstyle profile on Build Apache Ignite suite (test period)

Please, return checkstyle to run Ml, I use this feature вс, 13 окт. 2019 г., 18:52 Maxim Muzafarov : > Igniters, > > The `checkstyle` profile has been enabled for the Apache Ignite build > procedure. > Unused imports in the spark module have been fixed [1]. > The `[Check Code Style]` suite has be

Re: Enabling the checkstyle profile on Build Apache Ignite suite (test period)

Ok, thank you, I've missed the start of the discussion пн, 14 окт. 2019 г. в 11:13, Ivan Pavlukhin : > Alexey, Petr, > > Please read first message in this thread. Now checkstyle is a part of > [Build > Apache Ignite]. > > If you still have any questions after that please write back. > Sincerely,

Ignite-Spark integration meeting

Hi, Igniters, and especially Nikolay Izhikov I suggest to arrange the meeting via ASF-slack in #ignite-spark-integration channel at 17 October, in 16 MSK Time. The language of the meeting: Russian *The topics to discuss:* - Review of next tickets 1. [Spark][Bug] IgniteSpark integration f

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

Yes, let's use the Russian for short discussion, the meeting notes will be presented in English пн, 14 окт. 2019 г. в 14:08, Nikolay Izhikov : > Hello, Alexey. > > I'm ready to take part in the meeting. > It will be in Russian, isn't it? > > В Пн, 14/10/2019 в 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

Maybe we could move all our Streaming Integrations there, but what is about maintaining and committer permissions to the new repositories? I see the list of the committers and PMC members there https://bahir.apache.org/community-members/ Could somebody from Ignite community be added to this list a

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

author of this component Thanks пн, 14 окт. 2019 г. в 14:36, Alexey Zinoviev : > Yes, let's use the Russian for short discussion, the meeting notes will be > presented in English > > пн, 14 окт. 2019 г. в 14:08, Nikolay Izhikov : > >> Hello, Alexey. >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

Please, give me permissions too, I'd glad to help with this modules migration and support part of them in future, but also we need not only contributor but a few Committer permissions to merge In repository in other side it could be very long proccess. Could you ask Bahir Community about that? ср

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

Also, dear Saikat Maitra, could you please describe how you see the release cycles in Bahir Ignite Extensions and how it be related to Ignite release, 2.9, 3.0 for example. Thank you for your energy ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 8:10 Alexey Zinoviev : > Please, give me permissions too, I'd glad

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

ssions (something that > > > worked before but will fail) or capabilities unsupported even for the > > > presently released version of the integration? > > > > > > - > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

require this Visa. ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 16:25 Ivan Pavlukhin : > Actually, I meant running tests on TeamCity. > > ср, 23 окт. 2019 г. в 15:36, Alexey Zinoviev : > > > > What kind of testing do you mean? JUnit, integration via example or > > something else? > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

Currently, we discuss only candidates here, isn't it? This is not a vote? Also we should ask candidates about their plans, isn't it? Please, Denis, remind the procedure of voting, if we will have more than 1 candidate? Ans yet one suggestion: maybe we will rotate every year, and it will be easy

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

pace of Apache > > Ignite > > > > 1. Apache Bahir > > > > 2. Apache Incubator > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if option 2 is the best one since it is more about > > building > > > a > > > > new community around Ignit

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

Ha-ha, surely, I'm not a candidate to this place, but joining to the PMC club will be a honor for me. чт, 24 окт. 2019 г., 9:34 Anton Vinogradov : > More candidates: > > - Alexey Zinoviev. > He is not a PMC member, but it's definitely time to change this. > BigData eva

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

г., 9:50 Anton Vinogradov : > Agree with Alexey, > > Denis, could you please ask candidates privately whether they are ready to > become a PMC Chair and start the vote with the confirmed list? > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:47 AM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > Ha-ha,

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

PM Denis Magda > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about considering the option Dmitriy named as "0. placing > > >

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [4732696] needs to be handled

testDetails > > *Recently contributed test failed in master > JavaIgniteDataFrameSelfTest.testDataFrameJoinExample > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=-713429764581384&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails > Changes may lead to failure were done by >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite PMC Chair

+1 Dmitry Pavlov ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 13:50, Nikolay Izhikov : > +1 for Nikolay Izhikov (binding) > > В Вт, 29/10/2019 в 20:13 +0300, Pavel Tupitsyn пишет: > > +1 for Dmitry Pavlov > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:07 PM Ivan Rakov > wrote: > > > > > +1 for Dmitry Pavlov > > > > > > Best Regard

H2O integration

PyTorch for example Sincerely yours, Alexey Zinoviev

Re: H2O integration

ticles. > > Denis > > On Thursday, October 31, 2019, Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > Hi, Igniters, > >I happy to announce the new part of Ignite ML functionality. > > > > The integration with the popular distributed library H2O > > https://github

Re: H2O integration

Yes, you are correct чт, 31 окт. 2019 г., 20:29 Denis Magda : > Basically it means a model trained with H2O can be transformed to Ignite’s > one and executed in our cluster? Sorry if I’m still missing something. > > Denis > > On Thursday, October 31, 2019, Alexey Zinoviev >

Apache Ignite on Apache Con

Hi, Igniters, I've presented a new topic "Ensembles of ML algorithms and Distributed Online Machine Learning with Apache Ignite" on ApacheCon in Berlin this year. Video is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CmnV6IQtTw Slides are here https://speakerdeck.com/zaleslaw/ensembles-of-ml-algorithms-a

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

> > > > > > >> чт, 10 окт. 2019 г. в 14:41, Pavel Kovalenko < > > > jokse...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Issues link is broken, because it has a filter that can't > be >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

9 г. в 15:01, Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > > > > Alexey, > > > > > > True. It is definitely to early for Calcite. > > > > > > вт, 5 нояб. 2019 г. в 14:46, Alexey Zinoviev : > > > > > > > > I have no ideas, I think it

Re: [RESULT] Ignite PMC Chair Vote

Dmitry, congrats, we will wait the Community roadmap from you and will be happy to start discussion about that In asf slack or on dev-list! чт, 7 нояб. 2019 г., 12:27 Petr Ivanov : > Dmitriy, congratulations! > > > > On 7 Nov 2019, at 12:06, Николай Кулагин > wrote: > > > > Dmitry, my congratul

Re: The Spark 2.4 support

k 2.4 and continue work on known issues listed in JIRA This solution supports the new Spark version for all examples and 95% of tests of 2.3. вт, 1 окт. 2019 г. в 08:48, Ivan Pavlukhin : > Alexey, Nikolay, > > Thank you for sharing details! > > вт, 1 окт. 2019 г. в 07:42, Alexey Zino

Re: The Spark 2.4 support

t; Please help to understand what it means that 2.4 integration supports "95% > of tests of 2.3". Does it mean that 5% of existing tests are failing and, > basically, need to be fixed? > > - > Denis > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:52 AM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: >

ML Starter Tasks

Hi, Igniters and newbies from outer world. I've prepared today a few tickets for newbies under umbrella epic https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9281 Also, all open newbie tickets in Ignite ML could be found by filter https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12383?jql=project%20%3D%20

Re: ML Starter Tasks

2Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ml%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:20 PM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > > Hi, Igniters and newbies from outer world. > > I've prepared today a few

Re: ML Starter Tasks

ommunity/contribute.html#contribute > > The section needs cleaning but feel free to add the ML tasks to the top of > the list. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Website+Development > > - > Denis > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:20 AM Alexey Zinoviev &g

Re: ML Starter Tasks

I suggest to refresh this section on site not only for ML but for anotger parts too. вт, 19 нояб. 2019 г., 20:59 Alexey Zinoviev : > Yes, I'll add this information to the site next week > > вт, 19 нояб. 2019 г., 20:38 Denis Magda : > >> Alexey, excellent! How about m

Re: The Spark 2.4 support

ould advise us to merge the changes to the master only > after > > we confirm the failing tests are not regressions. We should either remove > > them or replace them with some others or just fix. > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at

Re: JDK11. ML module. Compilation error.

Will try to help, please create a ticket чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г., 15:25 Николай Ижиков : > Hello, guys. > > We have a compile error under Java11 in ML module. > Can someone take a look? > > ``` > sbt-izhikov-nv:~/src/ignite:[master]$ mvn -version > Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0b

Re: [MEETUP] 03.12.2019 Moscow

Really great idea to ask the community about Ignite 3.0, will wait the shared wisdom and thoughts чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 09:24, Николай Ижиков : > > Hello, Igniters. > > Join us on Ignite meetup! > > There will be cool old fashioned geeky Ignite talks and a "round table" > discussion about Ignite

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4 December 2019, the 2.8 RELEASE brach creation

Is it ok for me, but please move IGFS dropping ticket to the next release, I have no capacity to finish in time the blocker ticket related to Tensorflow-Ignite integration and as a result we shouldn't remove the IGFS yet but please mark it as a deprecated and ready for removal in 3.0 чт, 28 нояб.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4 December 2019, the 2.8 RELEASE brach creation

gnite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-8-RELEASE-Time-Scope-Manager-tp43616p44551.html > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 12:52, Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > > Is it ok for me, but please move IGFS dropping ticket to the next > release, > > I have no capaci

Re: [Webinar] Data Streaming Using Apache Flink and Apache Ignite

Great to get a video after to watch and share later, very ineresting case вс, 8 дек. 2019 г., 20:39 Saikat Maitra : > Hi, > > I will be presenting in a webinar about Data Streaming Using Apache Flink > and Apache Ignite on Wednesday, Dec 18th. > > > https://www.gridgain.com/resources/webinars/dat

Re: Adding support for Ignite secondary indexes to Apache Calcite planner

I'd like Drill approach, worked and debugged with something similar, it's more easy to support Buuut, you have an implemented prototype (it votes for Phoenix in my mind) вт, 10 дек. 2019 г. в 17:19, Vladimir Ozerov : > Hi Roman, > > Why do you think that Drill-style will not let you exploit col

Re: Contribution page & easy/moderate tickets for newcomers

Cool, filters much more better than previous list of tasks inserted directly in HTML сб, 21 дек. 2019 г. в 11:31, Pavel Tupitsyn : > Hi Denis, > > I've reviewed the list of newbie tickets for .NET, added some more there. > > Also I've updated the page a little bit: > > - Changed the wording of th

Re: How to use spark-2.4 module in Ignite 2.8?

Hi, I've found a bug in pom. It will be fixed on next week in master and release branches. Thank for the message! ср, 18 дек. 2019 г. в 22:11, Denis Magda : > Alexey, Nikolay, > > Could you please step in and shed some light on what has changed with > Spark? Probably, that's an issue that needs t

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

+1 чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 18:52, Sergey Antonov : > +1 > > I'm preparing patch for 2.8 branch now. TC Bot visa for 2.8 branch will be > at 13 Jan > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г., 21:06 Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > +1 > > > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 16:38, Ivan Rakov : > > > > > > Maxim M. and anyone who is intereste

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12225 > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7194 > [3] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolvedissues(notrelatedtodocumentation) > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 19:01, Alexey Zinoviev >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

> > > > >>> Folks, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Let me remind you that we are working on the 2.8 release branch > > > > > >>> stabilization currently (please, keep it in mind)

Re: How to use spark-2.4 module in Ignite 2.8?

I've fixed this issue in master and release branch, it works locally on my machine well https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12534 -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Ignite to H20 integration

The current integration could be used for model inference purposes only (on Ignite data) as presented in h20-ml-inference example. This features could be available in 2.8 Please have a look to https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/ml/inferen

Re: ML Model persist and reuse

I totally agree with you, that model saving is missed element in this framework. In this release I've experimented with binary format and with a commonly used format PMML (in scikit-learn and in Spark 1.0) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_Model_Markup_Language This is a link to the example

Re: Apache Ignite contribution

And dont forget asf slack with a few channel about Apache ignite пн, 27 янв. 2020 г., 12:20 Ivan Pavlukhin : > Maksim, folks, > > Actually I am curious what kind of communication channel is mentioned > telegram channel? Should we add a link to it on official "community > resources" page? > > пн,

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge PR via GitHub web UI

I used squash for last two years, no problemo with that. Of course we should have 1 commit to 1 PR relationship, don't put all your commits to the table:) пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 15:50, Alexei Scherbakov : > Petr Ivanov > > The script works great for me under windows. > > пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 15:3

Re: Apache Ignite contribution

> supplementary channels just for convenience (Slack for voice calls & > chats, > > Russian local resources for easier communication without foreign language > > barrier). But still, I hope we're on the same page that > > _If it didn't happen on the list, i

Re: Launched Ignite meetups and redesigned events pages

Count me in! пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 15:12, Dmitriy Pavlov : > Hi Denis, > > yes, sorry for late reply, I just did double check that I can access > answers. Additionally, Ksenia R. have access to proposals. > > Anyone from PMC who would like to volunteer and being PMC Representative > for Apache Ig

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Ignite PMC member: Igor Sapego

Great, congrats! пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 19:03, Kseniya Romanova : > My congratulations! > > пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 14:53, Dmitriy Pavlov : > > > Hi Igor, > > > > congrats with new role. > > > > Sincerely, > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > пн, 27 янв. 2020 г. в 12:51, Petr Ivanov : > > > > > Congratulation

Re: Random Forest, trying to evaluate accuracy but getting exception

Yes, the known issue in the Random Forest, it throws the strange math exception in the case, when the preprocessed vector has the different length with the vector which could be handled by the model. I didn't see your another code, but I could suppose, that you have another preprocessing stages lik

Re: [ML][IGNITE-12383][PR] Distances measures pull request

Hi, Ravil, I missed the notification, will do a review next week, thanks for the contrib! пн, 10 февр. 2020 г., 1:32 Ravil Galeyev : > Hi team, > > A week ago I submitted a pull-request > for IGNITE-12383 >

Re: [VOTE] Allow or prohibit a joint use of @deprecated and @IgniteExperimental

-1 Prohibit as PMC, I'd like new annotation, but suggest to play with them for the next 1-2 releases пн, 10 февр. 2020 г., 11:30 ткаленко кирилл : > +1 > > 10.02.2020, 11:02, "Alexey Goncharuk" : > > Dear Apache Ignite community, > > > > We would like to conduct a formal vote on the subject of wh

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12647) Get rid of IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator

Please, have a look another ticket related to the igfs, for example tensorflow via search. Agree that this is an abandoned part of ignite пн, 10 февр. 2020 г., 12:12 Anton Kalashnikov (Jira) : > Anton Kalashnikov created IGNITE-12647: > -- > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Complete Discontinuation of IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator

Tensorflow integration uses IGFS, if you have any idea how to store files in memory by another way, please suggest something. I hope to decouple Ignite-TF integration to the separate repository before release 2.9 with its own file system over Ignite Caches пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 12:49, Ivan Pavluk

Re: [DISCUSSION] Complete Discontinuation of IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator

Thank you so you much! Will wait:) пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 15:13, Alexey Goncharuk : > Got it, then no need to rush, let's wait for the TF-IGFS decoupling. > > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 13:15, Alexey Zinoviev : > > > Tensorflow integration uses IGFS, if you have any idea ho

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12657) ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

Thank you so much, will fix it next week вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:33 Stepan Pilschikov (Jira) : > Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-12657: > -- > > Summary: ML examples EvaluatorExample and > MultipleMetricsExample looks the same >

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

Great, thank you so much, will fix next week вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:39 Stepan Pilschikov : > Hi, Alexey, could you please looking on one small accident happen in ML > examples: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 - 2 examples exactly > the same. > > Also want to say that all pr

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Hello, Igniters Stepan found and reported bug related to lambda serialization/deserialization https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 The problem is the next: the ParamGrid object has a lambda in interface and this is an very bad for ML component, I've created a blocker bug https://issu

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

2020 г. в 11:52, Alexey Zinoviev : > >> Great, thank you so much, will fix next week >> >> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:39 Stepan Pilschikov > >: >> >>> Hi, Alexey, could you please looking on one small accident happen in ML >>> examples: >>> http

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

All ML bugs are fixed, tested on TC and merged to 2.8 release branch. Hope I'm not a blocker man now. вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 17:23, Alexey Zinoviev : > Hello, Igniters > > Stepan found and reported bug related to lambda > serialization/deserialization > https://issues.ap

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

approach when we cherry-pick fixes to the 2.8 only after all > fixes have verified in the master branch better? I just want to be > sure the release branch to be stable enough. > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 18:36, Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > > Fixed both in release

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

t; >> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Stepan Pilschikov < >> pilshchikov@gmail.com>: >> >>> Thanks for fix >>> Duplicated examples deleted and tutorial works on real (1+ node) cluster >>> now >>> I think ticket can be closed, have no p

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

Please, have a look to the next ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12659 Also tensorflow packages are blockers for IGFS deprecation and removal. ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 15:58, Alexey Zinoviev : > They are not lost, they are removed from release branch due to a lot of > bugs

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

gt;> Also found >> apache-ignite-2.8.0-bin/examples/src/main/resources/models/mleap >> I think its also should be removed then >> >> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 16:11, Alexey Zinoviev : >> >>> Please, have a look to the next ticket >>> https://issues.apa

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

> is haven't step completion log > And complete log for Step_9_Scaling_With_Stacking looks like 'Tutorial > step 5 (scaling) example completed' > > i don't know, should i made some ticket? One ticket for each problem or > one for all or you can fix it in one commit? because fixes q

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

tepan Pilschikov : > filled ticket - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12673 > > чт, 13 февр. 2020 г. в 13:46, Alexey Zinoviev : > >> I suppose one ticket is enough, collect where all your nites and thoughts >> >> чт, 13 февр. 2020 г., 12:12 Stepan Pilschik

Re: [ML] Tickets for beginners

Hi, Lev! I'll return with explanation on next week, maybe I need to adds some details to this ticket. P.S. About dataset - you could search among the datasets presented in MLSandbox class or could add your own (I'd prefer small datasets from http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php) пт, 14 февр.

Re: [ML] Tickets for beginners

you could create something meaningful like this. Your choice! пт, 14 февр. 2020 г. в 10:17, Alexey Zinoviev : > Hi, Lev! > I'll return with explanation on next week, maybe I need to adds some > details to this ticket. > > P.S. About dataset - you could search among the d

Re: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample looks the same

Fixed your comments! Stepan, please rebuild the release and test! чт, 13 февр. 2020 г. в 17:22, Alexey Zinoviev : > Should I wait any ML-related issues in examples? > I could wait a day or two if you are going to continue your testing deals > with ML and examples to push changes

Re: Is ML module @IgniteExperimental?

Hello, Igniters, and you, Nikolay. First of all, if you have real interest to the ML module and its state, I could make call with you and explain this. *As far as I know, for now, we have only 1 active contributor to this area -Alexey Zinoviev.* Currently, we have 2 active contributors, me and

Re: Is ML module @IgniteExperimental?

h or > Russain. > > > > > > [1] https://dssconf.pl/ > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/ml > > > > Best regards, > > > > Ravil > > > > > >

Re: Hello all

Hi, Alex, do you have any experience with Ignite itself? if no, I could suggest you to run cluster on a few nodes before development and run examples. What kind of Ignite tickets are you looking for? Core/SQL/ML/Tests/Docs/anything else? вт, 18 февр. 2020 г. в 14:20, Алексей Высотин : > Hello Ign

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Vyacheslav Koptilin

Slava, cool, good luck with merging to MASTER!!! ср, 19 февр. 2020 г. в 11:45, Petr Ivanov : > Congratulations! > > > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 22:20, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > > > > Hello Ignite Community, > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite has invited > > Vyacheslav Kopt

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

this as a new section to the > Ignite 2.8 release wiki page for ease of tracking and start working with > the guys contributed improvements directly. Will see the names of the > authors who need to be involved ;) > > *Alexey Zinoviev*, there are many ML related changes coming in the &g

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

I've created a draft pages on apache.readme.io and will continue my work there during next 2 weeks. Should I create any tickets for that? Or could miss that step? Will notify in this thread than the work will be done! чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 12:16, Alexey Zinoviev : > Yes, there are

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

aring at least one blog for > Ignite 2.8 and can create an ML specific blog as well. Also, the tickets > might simplify the review process between you and Artem. > > - > Denis > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:18 AM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > >> I've created

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

Please, could you post in this thread a few examples of the documentation tickets in JIRA for the current release, to create them correctly? пн, 24 февр. 2020 г. в 14:53, Alexey Zinoviev : > Ok, will make ticket, no problemo > > вс, 23 февр. 2020 г., 23:28 Denis Magda : > >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1

I have no idea what is the slim package and why the Ml should be remove from that. We doesnt discuss it before and it looks like very strange list is not based on previos discussions Also, I see, that Ilya has outdated list of modules: we see here removed tensorflow and missed New Spark 2.4 module

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1

Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could be form by voting on user-list сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk : > Nikolay, Alexey, > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker image was discussed > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about removin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1

y have known > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also considered > vulnerable by some scanners. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev : > > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could be form by &

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

ere is either: > > - writeThrough enabled and all changes do through it. > > - database contents do not change for already read keys. > > > > Thanks, > > Prasad > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 7:31 PM Alexey Zinoviev > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1

+1 (binding) I've downloaded the binary archive, run it, checked the ML examples and JavaDocs. вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 13:49, Ivan Pavlukhin : > +1 (binding) > > Downloaded binary distribution archive, launched a cluster of 2 nodes, > created/filled/queried a table using sqlline. > > A couple of m

Re: Ignite 2.8 announcement plan

detail. Please see an abstract > below with suggested topics for a detailed overview. @Alexey Zinoviev > , would you be able to present the ML part? > @Nikolay > Izhikov or @Andrey Gura would > you like to take over the metrics section? I'll work the attendees through > the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1

gt; > > > > > > > > The vote for a new release candidate is closed, now. > > > Vote result: The vote PASSES with 6 votes +1 (6 bindings), 0 two votes > > > and no -1. > > > > > > > > > +1 votes: > > > - Denis Magda (bin

Re: Apache Ignite ML & Python

Agree with simple case, I think we could start from the simple poc for the Python for ML in the next release чт, 5 мар. 2020 г., 17:05 AG : > > Thanks, for the reply! > > It looks like a high-level API similar to Sklearn pipelines. > In my opinion, for the first steps easier to add simple assess

Re: Apache Ignite ML & Python

Agree with simple case, I think we could start from the simple poc for the Python for ML in the next release чт, 5 мар. 2020 г., 17:05 AG : > > Thanks, for the reply! > > It looks like a high-level API similar to Sklearn pipelines. > In my opinion, for the first steps easier to add simple assess

Re: Apache Ignite ML & Python

gt; > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > Agree with simple case, I think we could start from the simple poc for > the > > Python for ML in the next release > > > > чт, 5 мар. 2020 г., 17:05 AG : > > > > > > > >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Great dates for released, I support mr. Chetaev чт, 12 мар. 2020 г., 17:38 Aleksey Chetaev : > Hi, Igniters! > I propose to discuss immediately the timing of 2.9.0 and interim releases! > My propose: > ~ June 01 - 2.8.1 > ~ September 01 - 2.8.2 > ~ November 01 - 2.9.0 > > Sberbank team, for its p

Re: Commit message format

Ok, lets keep in mind and remind during PRs to each other чт, 19 мар. 2020 г., 17:32 Andrey Gura : > Igniters, > > please, notice that right commit message format the following: > > IGNITE- my message > > There is no colon (:) after . There is no hyphen (-) between > and message. The

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Could we add features to the scope of this release? Or we will fix known bugs only? чт, 19 мар. 2020 г., 17:59 Nikolay Izhikov : > I want to be a release manager. > > > > 19 марта 2020 г., в 17:52, Denis Magda написал(а): > > > > Igniters, > > > > As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already ke

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes in Ignite release process related to documentation

The Best way to require draft documentation with the proposed PR:) as a part of TC check чт, 19 мар. 2020 г., 21:06 Denis Magda : > Igniters, > > I've modified our release process introducing this step that ensures > documentation readiness before a vote can be started: > > https://cwiki.apache.o

Re: Is ML module @IgniteExperimental?

; algorithms that had a dependency on the compute APIs only? > > [1] https://ignite.apache.org/features/tensorflow.html > [2] https://ignite.apache.org/features/machinelearning.html#ga-grid > > - > Denis > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 5:39 AM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote

Re: Ignite XGBoost support

Ignite ML could be used to become the platform for distributed training, you answers will be helpful. Sincerely yours, Alexey Zinoviev пт, 27 мар. 2020 г. в 01:04, Carbone, Adam : > Good afternoon Denis, > > Nice to meet you, Hello to you too Alexey. So I'm not sure if it w

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12846) Docs: ml package org.apache.ignite.ml.knn.utils.indices have no description in binary release

Do you mean missed package-level docs, isn't it? вт, 31 мар. 2020 г. в 11:52, Stepan Pilschikov (Jira) : > Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-12846: > -- > > Summary: Docs: ml package > org.apache.ignite.ml.knn.utils.indices have no description i

Re: JSR 381 (Visual Recognition in Java) and Apache Ignite

implementing it. > > Zoran and Frank, > > Please meet Alexey Zinoviev, who is the principal maintainer of the Apache > ML module. I hope he will be able to help you with your questions. > > Regards, > Vladimir. >

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12849) Add New BinaryObject Vectorizer for SparseVectors and Integer Coordinates

Great suggestion! Are you ready to make a PR for any of suggested ideas? вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 20:26 Glenn Wiebe (Jira) : > Glenn Wiebe created IGNITE-12849: > > > Summary: Add New BinaryObject Vectorizer for SparseVectors > and Integer Coordinate

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12849) Add New BinaryObject Vectorizer for SparseVectors and Integer Coordinates

Especially I'd like to add to String method for vectors, what information could be added here, what do you think? вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 20:41 Alexey Zinoviev : > Great suggestion! Are you ready to make a PR for any of suggested ideas? > > > вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 20:26

  1   2   3   >