I have no idea what is the slim package and why the Ml should be remove
from that. We doesnt discuss it before and it looks like very strange list
is not based on previos discussions

Also, I see, that Ilya has outdated list of modules: we see here removed
tensorflow and missed New Spark 2.4 module.

Ilya, please update the current list of modules from the Master and later I
share the thread/wiki with the previos discussion about removing package
and ignite extension process.




сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 1:17 Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:

> Ilya,
>
>
> Actually I don't remember that we've come to an agreement with the
> list of modules for "slim" distribution. AFAIR, those discussion still
> not finished.
>
> Also, why should we remove `ignite-ml` from current distribution?
> Alexey, should we?
>
> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 00:38, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to produce the slim package. Though, if it's time
> > consuming then we should target it to 2.8.1.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:36 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <
> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Are we doing a "slim" package for 2.8, though?
> > >
> > > There was a suggestion to remove the following modules from slim binary
> > > distribution:
> > >
> > > ignite-aop
> > > ignite-aws
> > > ignite-camel
> > > ignite-cassandra-serializers
> > > ignite-cassandra-store
> > > ignite-cloud
> > > ignite-direct-io
> > > ignite-flink
> > > ignite-flume
> > > ignite-gce
> > > ignite-jcl
> > > ignite-jms11
> > > ignite-jta
> > > ignite-kafka
> > > ignite-mesos
> > > ignite-ml
> > > ignite-mqtt
> > > ignite-osgi
> > > ignite-osgi-karaf
> > > ignite-osgi-paxlogging
> > > ignite-rocketmq
> > > ignite-scalar
> > > ignite-scalar_2.10
> > > ignite-spark
> > > ignite-ssh
> > > ignite-storm
> > > ignite-tensorflow
> > > ignite-twitter
> > > ignite-web
> > > ignite-yarn
> > > ignite-zeromq
> > > ignite-zookeeper
> > >
> > > Plus, remove benchmarks/ from slim package either.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >
> > >
> > > пт, 28 февр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Maxim,
> > > >
> > > > Finally, thanks a lot for starting the voting process!
> > > >
> > > > I've already cast my vote and want to bring up some issues that are
> not
> > > > blockers though:
> > > >
> > > >    1. Ignite technical documentation is not finished yet - @Artem
> > > Budnikov
> > > >    <abudni...@gridgain.com> is coordinating this process as well as
> > > >    contributes to many open tickets. Even if the vote passes, the
> release
> > > >    cannot be *announced* until the docs are finished. I would
> encourage
> > > >    everyone involved in 2.8 docs creation to pull together,
> collaborate
> > > and
> > > >    complete all the pending tickets throughout the next week.
> > > >    2. Missing API references for Node.JS, Python and PHP clients [1]
> -
> > > need
> > > >    to be addressed at least for 2.8.1 since the problem is not new to
> > > 2.8.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Node-JS-PHP-Python-API-references-for-Ignite-2-8-release-td46097.html
> > > > -
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:10 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Community,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please use this thread for all non-voting, discussion, questions
> > > > > related to this 2.8.0-rc1 release.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cast your vote here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Ignite-2-8-0-RC1-td46140.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to