Sure, done.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Dmitry Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi Pavel, thank you. Could you please do the same for this modules?
> I can remove gitter but I am not sure about CI server links correctness.
>
> чт, 2 нояб. 2017 г. в 9:38, Pavel Tupitsyn :
>
> > Denis, Dmitry,
> >
> > Looks l
Hi Pavel, thank you. Could you please do the same for this modules?
I can remove gitter but I am not sure about CI server links correctness.
чт, 2 нояб. 2017 г. в 9:38, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Denis, Dmitry,
>
> Looks like you forgot
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/dot
Denis, Dmitry,
Looks like you forgot
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/dotnet
and
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
Thanks,
Pavel
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> Denis, thank you for review and merge!
> Link w
Denis, thank you for review and merge!
Link was removed also from https://github.com/apache/ignite repository main
page.
Also link to TeamCity builds was updated. Dynamic build status SVG provided
by TC won't be displayed correctly by github because github performs image
caching, but link is now c
Gitter channel evaporated from the Ignite site. Exhale folks...
—
Denis
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 2:55 AM, Konstantin Dudkov wrote:
>
> Agree.
>
> IMHO we should remove link to gitter from everywhere and keep answering
> there, but for questions about product usage we should ask to ask the
> que
Agree.
IMHO we should remove link to gitter from everywhere and keep answering
there, but for questions about product usage we should ask to ask the
question in userlist.
27/10/2017 02:10, Dmitriy Setrakyan пишет:
How about we continue to have the Gitter channel, but remove the link from
the
Agree
--Yakov
How about we continue to have the Gitter channel, but remove the link from
the website?
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> I would consider moving decent questions to mailing lists asking to do so
> in response to gitter requests and at some point stop gitter.
>
> --Yakov
>
I would consider moving decent questions to mailing lists asking to do so
in response to gitter requests and at some point stop gitter.
--Yakov
I fully agree with Konstantin and Denis.
Gitter is a project without owner and we should find owner or get rid of
it.
User & dev lists seem to be enough to keep moving forward.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> I share the same opinion as Konstantin.
>
> Gitter/slack/whatever
I share the same opinion as Konstantin.
Gitter/slack/whatever is a good communication channel for contributors and
committers who *work together* on a specific functionality or component and
want to discuss things faster.
As for general user or dev questions they should be directed to the maili
Correction: "I do *NOT* think it is good idea to remove this channel
completely."
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> I do think it is good idea to remove this channel completely. It is true,
> that Gitter is not very convenient instrument. But it is very ea
Konstantin,
I do think it is good idea to remove this channel completely. It is true,
that Gitter is not very convenient instrument. But it is very easy to use
from user perspective, especially for ad hoc questions and chatting about
the product. SO is not appropriate for this due to aggressive mo
Igniters,
Last months there are a lot of questions in userlist and gitter and
answering that questions I found gitter completely inappropriate for
user support:
- there are no threads there, so it's hard to track discussion or see
unanswered questions
- when somebody post stacktrace or cod
14 matches
Mail list logo
