[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2621 .NET: Fix compute in mixed-platfo...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/505 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2752) LINQ NuGet package

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2752: -- Summary: LINQ NuGet package Key: IGNITE-2752 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2752 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task Repo

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2751) GridH2TreeIndex.getRowCount unwraps objects' values that are not used later

Denis Magda created IGNITE-2751: --- Summary: GridH2TreeIndex.getRowCount unwraps objects' values that are not used later Key: IGNITE-2751 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2751 Project: Ig

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2750) REST connection is closed on the server side ignoring unfinished client requests

Denis Magda created IGNITE-2750: --- Summary: REST connection is closed on the server side ignoring unfinished client requests Key: IGNITE-2750 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2750 Projec

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2749) Web session clustering works incorrectly with WebLogic

Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2749: --- Summary: Web session clustering works incorrectly with WebLogic Key: IGNITE-2749 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2749 Project: Ignite

Re: Thief node does not belong to task topology [was "Failed to send message"]

Hi Paolo, See my comment in the ticket. -Val On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso wrote: > Hi Val, > > I surely can contribute on that issue but I would need a fix as soon as > possible so I will do both. Thus, I will try the dirty path on my own > implementation and to implement a

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2748) Service proxy makes remote call for methods declared in java.lang.Object

Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2748: --- Summary: Service proxy makes remote call for methods declared in java.lang.Object Key: IGNITE-2748 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2748

Re: Contributions that are waiting for review

I would better ask contributors to ping committers on the dev list when a patch is available asking for review. It can happen that committers missed or forgot to do the review and a contributor can remind them sending one more email to the dev list. I don't see anything wrong with this approa

Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

Thank you Val, this is very helpful. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Deprecate-IgniteConfiguration-getGridName-tp2420p7685.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Contributions that are waiting for review

Roman, Please send the message directly to the dev list when you need a review. Quite often people who open an issue are not eligible for review and thus don't provide any feedback. Regards, Denis On 3/2/2016 4:08 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote: I have also asked for review of the following tickets

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2747) ODBC: Time cast returns wrong results for Linux.

Igor Sapego created IGNITE-2747: --- Summary: ODBC: Time cast returns wrong results for Linux. Key: IGNITE-2747 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2747 Project: Ignite Issue Type: S

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2333

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/462 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[GitHub] ignite pull request: ignite-2734 Binary enum type deserialization ...

Github user agura closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/524 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

Re: Contributions that are waiting for review

Denis, We have a special status at Ignite JIRA - PATCH AVAILABLE which means that issue ready to be reviewed. Currently 59 issues has such status according to https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-2&jql=project%20%3D%20Ignite%20and%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22 I think we have

Re: Contributions that are waiting for review

I have also asked for review of the following tickets but failed to get a feedback. They are not complicated, but I would appreciate a quick review. Thank you! [IGNITE-2563] Queries: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when using BOOL_AND https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2563 IGNITE-2416

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2746) .NET: Improve ReflectiveSerializer control with attributes

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2746: -- Summary: .NET: Improve ReflectiveSerializer control with attributes Key: IGNITE-2746 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2746 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request: Ignite 2191 Not to merge

Github user ashutakGG closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/424 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2740 Remove error in IGNITE_HOME check

GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/531 IGNITE-2740 Remove error in IGNITE_HOME check You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ptupitsyn/ignite ignite-2740 Alternatively you

[GitHub] ignite pull request: Ignite-2191 Experiment (not to merge)

Github user ashutakGG closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/419 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2745) Fast access to GridTopic listeners.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2745: --- Summary: Fast access to GridTopic listeners. Key: IGNITE-2745 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2745 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-ta

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2744) Optimize "unwindEvict" call in GridCacheIoManager.processMessage().

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2744: --- Summary: Optimize "unwindEvict" call in GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(). Key: IGNITE-2744 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2744 Project: Ig

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2743) Broken download page on ignite.apache.org

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2743: -- Summary: Broken download page on ignite.apache.org Key: IGNITE-2743 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2743 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bu

Re: Multimap implementation attempt

Hi Konstantin! I have added a comment to the ticket. --Yakov 2016-03-01 16:13 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Margorin : > Hello Igniters. > > I'm trying now to implement Multimap datastructure. I wrote a comment about > implementation details here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640 > >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2742) Do not save "confirm" and "agree" on user sign up

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2742: -- Summary: Do not save "confirm" and "agree" on user sign up Key: IGNITE-2742 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2742 Project: Ignite

Thief node does not belong to task topology [was "Failed to send message"]

Hi Val, I surely can contribute on that issue but I would need a fix as soon as possible so I will do both. Thus, I will try the dirty path on my own implementation and to implement a fix for IGNITE-1267 . However also in the above issue the last

[GitHub] ignite pull request: Fix for jCache TCK

Github user ashutakGG closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/528 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

Contributions that are waiting for review

Ignite committers, There is a number of contributions that have to be reviewed. Please pick them up basing on your experience and provide your review notes. Ignite 2718: Missing ZookeeperIpFinder dependencies IGNITE-2693: withKeepBinary and n