Hi Val, I surely can contribute on that issue but I would need a fix as soon as possible so I will do both. Thus, I will try the dirty path on my own implementation and to implement a fix for IGNITE-1267 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1267>.
However also in the above issue the last comment suggests to remove the check on the task topology and I have any clue of any better alternative. Could you clarify how do you think it should be fixed? Cheers, Paolo On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:56 PM, vkulichenko <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Paolo, > > I found the ticket about this issue [1]. How about picking it up and fixing > instead of implementing your own version of the SPI? > > Removing the check completely is wrong, because it's possible that a node > doesn't belong to the cluster group on which the task was executed. But we > should check the original predicate instead of collection of nodes sealed > during the map phase. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1267 > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-send-message-tp3217p3317.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
