Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling more Meetups

Hi, Thanks for the proposal Russell! JB also raised some fair points regarding use of trademarks. We can adjust the proposal slightly to include the use of trademarks: """ The Apache Iceberg community supports Apache Iceberg meetups. The name "Apache Iceberg Meetup " may be used in compliance wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 release

Hi Steven, When do you plan to cut the release branch? I would like to get https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12424 in. Thanks, Max On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi > > I think I have multi-args transforms in good shape to be in the scope > for 1.10.0. Rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.5.1 RC1

Hi: We still need two PMC votes for this release! Please help to test and verify. On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:17 AM Drew wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > [x] Download links are valid. > [x] Checksums and signatures. > [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist > [x] No unexpected binary files > [x] All source

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 release

Hi I think I have multi-args transforms in good shape to be in the scope for 1.10.0. Related to V3 spec, it would be great to include it in 1.10.0 release. Thanks ! Regards JB On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:08 PM Steven Wu wrote: > > > As discussed in the community sync, we are planning for the next

Re: [Announce] Iceberg Meetup Berlin - 3rd of July

Hi Christian, Thanks for posting the link! Looking forward to the meetup. Cheers, Max On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 8:10 PM Christian Thiel wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > The next Iceberg Meetup Europe is coming to Berlin on July 3rd! > Please register at: https://lu.ma/pposobem > The Call for Speakers

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

I forgot Peter! I'm so sorry! That should have been +1: 4 (binding), 5 (non-binding). {Russell, Steven Wu, Fokko, Peter} | {JB, Karuppayya, Kevin, Huaxin, Aihua} +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 4:29 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling more Meetups

Hi all, Love that we're opening discussion around making meetups more accessible! I do think it would be in everyone's best interest to outline some guidelines around what *we* believe is a good meetup and post them on the community section of the site

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling more Meetups

Thanks Max and Danica, I have no problems adjusting the verbage or adding some best practices. On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:52 PM Danica Fine wrote: > Hi all, > > Love that we're opening discussion around making meetups more accessible! > > I do think it would be in everyone's best interest to outl

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Iceberg release 1.9.1

I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache Iceberg 1.9.1! Apache Iceberg is an open table format for huge analytic datasets. Iceberg delivers high query performance for tables with tens of petabytes of data, along with atomic commits, concurrent writes, and SQL-compatible table evolution. This

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Iceberg Go v0.3.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I checked: > * signature and checksum are good > * no binary found in the source distribution > * ASF header in all expected files > * LICENSE and NOTICE look good (nit: NOT

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the v3 spec changes

Since the voting is passed, I went ahead and created the PR to update the spec that v3 is complete. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13175 This has came up in one of the recent discussions in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13123#discussion_r2105451519 - Ajantha On Fri, May 23, 2025

Re: Wide tables in V4

I would be happy to put together a proposal based on the inputs got here. Thanks everyone for your thoughts! I will try to incorporate all of this. Thanks, Peter Daniel Weeks ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 27., K, 20:07): > I feel like we have two different issues we're talking about here that

Re: [DISCUSS] Events Endpoint for IRC

Thank you all for the great discussion today! I have updated the proposal. Key changes are: - Specify that clients should ignore unknown operation & event types - Specify the `actor` field as part of the `Event` schema as an opaque string. Remove the `Actor` type. - Remove the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 release

JB, please set the milestone to the multi-arg transform PRs/issues. Peter/Max, ack on the changes targeted for 1.10. Let's see if they can be reviewed and ready. Max, the initial plan is to cut the release branch on June 23. We can confirm or fine tune the date as we evaluate the status of the re

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling more Meetups

Since we're also having various discussions in Slack, folks should join the Iceberg Slack to have informal discussions around all these meetup efforts. We would still want to send this out to the dev list as Danica noted - just wanted to call out that we're already having these informal discussion