+1 (binding) Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I checked: > * signature and checksum are good > * no binary found in the source distribution > * ASF header in all expected files > * LICENSE and NOTICE look good (nit: NOTICE copyright should be > updated I guess and also not sure if the "This product includes > software developed at The Apache Software Foundation > (http://www.apache.org/)." is correct here) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of > > Apache Iceberg Go version v0.3.0. > > > > This release candidate is based on commit: > > 8270498f1932bececb5cec22c174df5f1865f7eb [1] > > > > The source release rc0 is hosted at [2]. > > > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, > > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.3.0 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.3.0 because... > > > > [1]: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/tree/8270498f1932bececb5cec22c174df5f1865f7eb > > [2]: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-go-0.3.0-rc0 > > [3]: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify >
