Thanks Marc.
I gonna review the new PR.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 20 déc. 2024 à 00:48, Marc Cenac
a écrit :
> Yesterday we reverted the PR in main and cherry picked into the 1.7.x
> branch https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11817
>
> Today I have opened https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/118
Yesterday we reverted the PR in main and cherry picked into the 1.7.x
branch https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11817
Today I have opened https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11830 which is
the previous code with some new tests and a fix for the breaking change
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 1:59
Apologies for introducing the breaking change. I just opened
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11812 to revert. Let me know if
there is something else I can do to help fix
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Cheng,
>
> Thanks for the update. The issue appeared
Hi Cheng,
Thanks for the update. The issue appeared in the test, but I guess it
can also impact runtime use.
Let me take a look at the update PR.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>
> Spark 3.5.4 (under RC3 voting) introduces a breaking change that requires
> Iceberg
Spark 3.5.4 (under RC3 voting) introduces a breaking change that requires
Iceberg to be patched[1]. Please include Spark 3.5.4 support in the patch
release.
Since some users are sticky to Java 8, it would be great if Iceberg also
releases a new patch version of 1.6.x, otherwise they won’t be ab
That works for me. In the meantime, I will draft a proposal (in terms
of content) for 1.8.0.
I volunteer to drive 1.7.2 release if needed.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:58 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
>
> Thanks for raising this Alex,
>
> I suggest doing a 1.7.2 patch release since we don'
I agree with Fokko in that we should do a 1.7.2 release for people using
ADLSFileIO
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:58 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> Thanks for raising this Alex,
>
> I suggest doing a 1.7.2 patch release since we don't want to leave the
> 1.7.x version in a broken state for the ADLSFil
I took the liberty of creating a 1.7.2 milestone:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/52
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op di 17 dec 2024 om 09:58 schreef Fokko Driesprong :
> Thanks for raising this Alex,
>
> I suggest doing a 1.7.2 patch release since we don't want to leave the
> 1.7.x version in
Thanks for raising this Alex,
I suggest doing a 1.7.2 patch release since we don't want to leave the
1.7.x version in a broken state for the ADLSFileIO.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op di 17 dec 2024 om 07:40 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Hi Alex,
>
> It was exactly my concern (and question) when I d
Hi Alex,
It was exactly my concern (and question) when I did the review on the PR.
I agree it's breaking change and definitely not good in a micro/patch release.
As 1.7.0 is still working, I would propose to wait 1.8.0 if possible:
I'm actually preparing a new thread with 1.8.0 proposal (in term
10 matches
Mail list logo
