Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Thanks everyone for voting. With 3 binding votes the vote passes and we can release PyIceberg 0.3.0. Many thanks everyone for testing the release and contributing to the code! Votes +1: Amogh Jahagirdar (non-binding) Prashant Singh (non-binding) Jack Ye (binding) Daniel Weeks (binding) Eduard Tude

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 (binding) - Validated checksum and signature - Ran RAT check - Built and tested in Python 3.10.5 - Installed the rc from pypi - Ran pyiceberg commands I did hit a slight issue, which was that when I didn’t specify the optional pyarrow dependency when I installed, the CLI failed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures/checksums/license checks/tests and ran some manual tests with the REST catalog. Thanks Fokko and others, this looks great. Eduard On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 8:07 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified sig/sums/license/test (including s3) > > Ran t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 (binding) Verified sig/sums/license/test (including s3) Ran through some manual tests using the REST Catalog and everything worked as expected. Looks great, -Dan On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jack Ye wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified signature, checksum, RAT > > Ran unit and integration

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 (binding) Verified signature, checksum, RAT Ran unit and integration tests, plus some manual testing of Glue catalog. Best, Jack Ye On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:57 PM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Release this as PyIceberg 0.3.0 > > Verified signatures, checksums, RAT checks. Ran th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 (non-binding) Release this as PyIceberg 0.3.0 Verified signatures, checksums, RAT checks. Ran the unit and integration tests as per https://py.iceberg.apache.org/verify-release/ Regards, Prashant Singh On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:06 PM Jahagirdar, Amogh wrote: > +1 non-binding for the PyIceb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+1 non-binding for the PyIceberg 0.3.0 release. Verified signatures, checksums, RAT checks. Ran the unit and integration tests. Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar From: "Driesprong, Fokko" Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Date: Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:59 PM To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Subje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Thanks Amogh for fixing this. Let me run another RC. Op ma 30 jan. 2023 om 08:35 schreef Jahagirdar, Amogh : > Awesome, I’ll take a look Fokko. > > Here’s the PR against the 0.3.0 branch for updating the build to include > the dev folder: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6704 > > PR agains

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Awesome, I’ll take a look Fokko. Here’s the PR against the 0.3.0 branch for updating the build to include the dev folder: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6704 PR against the master branch: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6705 Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

I've created a fix for the warning for the 0.3.0 release: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6702 Also, created a PR to fix this on master, and also turned warnings into errors: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6703/ Kind regards, Fokko Op

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Perfect, and I agree that a branch is a great idea. There is some work on the current master branch that needs a bit more testing before releasing that to the public. I've created a branch called pyiceberg-0.3.x . Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Sure, happy to raise a PR! I think we’ll need to create a branch off of the 0.3.0 commit to update for this release, and then a separate PR with the change against master as well for future releases. Let me know if this is what you had in mind. Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar From: "Driesprong, Fokk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Thanks for running the checks Daniel, and I can confirm that those files are missing. I think it makes sense to add them. Amogh, do you want to create a PR for this? I think it would be best to just include the dev folder, to make sure that we don't forget to include future files. I’ll dig into th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

If I’m not mistaken, I think the issue is that the release tarball is missing the rat-excludes file and the relevant scripts from the dev folder. I ran the tests by checking out the source at the release candidate tag which has all the relevant files. I think we should include these files in th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

+0 Verified sigs and sums, but ran into the following issues running through the verification steps: *Ran into the following error verifying the licenses. Touching the file fixed the issue.* $ ./dev/check-license Attempting to fetch rat Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: /

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.3.0

Hi all, +1 non-binding for the release of PyIceberg 0.3.0 Verified signatures, checksums, license documentation and ran the unit and integration tests! Thanks Fokko! Amogh Jahagirdar On 2023/01/25 14:22:58 "Driesprong, Fokko" wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > I propose that we release the following