Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Thanks everyone, Concluding the vote: +1 by: - Xuanwo - Ryan Blue (binding) - Jean-Baptiste Onofré - Daniel Weeks (binding) - Fokko (binding) Thanks everyone for testing, appreciate it! The release is already out. Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 18 sep 2023 om 19:01 schreef Daniel Weeks : > +1 (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Verified sigs/sums/license/tests Also tested some schema evolution and various other local tests and everything worked great. -Dan On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 8:15 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Changing my vote to +1. Thanks for fixing the checksum, Fokko! > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 8:04 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Changing my vote to +1. Thanks for fixing the checksum, Fokko! On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 8:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > quickly tested the "legal" part: > - signatures/hash has been fixed thanks for that ! > - ASF header looks ok > - no binaries found in the pyiceberg d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

+1 (non binding) quickly tested the "legal" part: - signatures/hash has been fixed thanks for that ! - ASF header looks ok - no binaries found in the pyiceberg distribution which is good Thanks ! Regards JB On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:18 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > I propose

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

I've corrected it for RC3 as well, so we don't need to send out another RC. Cheers, Fokko Op za 16 sep 2023 om 22:32 schreef Fokko Driesprong : > Hey Ryan, > > Thanks for catching that. It slipped in here >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Hey Ryan, Thanks for catching that. It slipped in here . I made the fix part of PR #8504 , I think

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

-1 I went to verify the sha512 sum, but it is missing. If we can add the correct checksum, then I'll update my vote. Looks like the sha512 sum for the GPG signature file was added instead: pyiceberg-0.5.0.tar.gz*.asc*.sha512 Everything else looks good. - Ran license checks - Verified signature -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Hi, +1 (non-binding) I have checked: - signature that made by fo...@apache.org ``` :) for name in $(ls /tmp/pyiceberg/pyiceberg-*.whl /tmp/pyiceberg/pyiceberg-*.tar.gz) do gpg --verify ${name}.asc ${name} done gpg: Signature made Wed 13 Sep 2023 08:07:40 PM CST gpg:using RSA ke

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Hey everyone, A small follow-up on how to easily run the checks: curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS -o KEYS gpg --import KEYS svn checkout https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.5.0rc3/ /tmp/pyiceberg/ for name in $(ls /tmp/pyiceberg/pyiceberg-*.whl /tm

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.0 release. This includes the performance issue that was discovered in RC2. A summary of what's included in 0.5.0: - Add gzip metadata support - PyArrow HDFS s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hi Fokko, I agree: let's move forward on 0.5.0 release and we can submit 0.5.1 very soon after 0.5.0. Thanks ! Regards JB On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 7:15 PM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > After an issue on Github, I noticed a bug in PyIceberg that the filesystem > isn't being reus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hey everyone, After an issue on Github , I noticed a bug in PyIceberg that the filesystem isn't being reused . I think there is more room for improvement (both in the long and short term), but I don't think

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.0 release. A summary of what's included in 0.5.0: - Add gzip metadata support - PyArrow HDFS support - Support

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

I just merged the fallback to Python if the Cython decoder isn't available. Ready for the next RC! On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 6:01 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > An update from my end. There is a PR ready to run the Avro decoder tests > against the binary

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

An update from my end. There is a PR ready to run the Avro decoder tests against the binary wheel. I'm able to reproduce the issue on my end, and after including the `.pyd` files I noticed that the tests failed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hey everyone, Thanks for casting the vote, appreciate it. I would like to cancel this RC, and run RC2 which will include 3 PRs: - Python: Non-Cython fallback Avro parser - Python: Fix pyarrow hdfs support

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum, license using the updated steps Ran tests via "make test-coverage" Ran glue integration tests Best regards, Jonas On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 3:19 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non binding) I ran the example notebooks and tested some queries > with PyA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

+1 (non binding) I ran the example notebooks and tested some queries with PyArrow and Pandas On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:21 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hi everyone > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.0 > release. > > The commit ID is 5bd7c649e4743a61eace5f5

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hi everyone I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.0 release. The commit ID is 5bd7c649e4743a61eace5f52517db9b5b56ff8e6 * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.5.0rc1 ( 4f314fc507dec4ae918d3a3dfba567a28f92ac22) * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/releases/tag