Hey everyone,
Thanks for voting! The 72 hours have passed, and a minimum of 3 binding
votes have been cast:
+1 Xuanwo (non-binding)
+1 Jan Kaul (non-binding)
+1 NOTME ZE (non-binding)
+1 Chojan Shang (non-binding)
+1 Amogh Jahagirdar (non-binding)
+1 Renjie Liu (non-binding)
+1 Daniel Weeks (bind
Hi, Ryan:
>- The REST catalog was unable to resolve icebergdata.minio causing 2
>test failures. I had to switch over to local FS to run tests or else
>rest_catalog_test cases test_create_table and test_update_table would fail.
>I suspect this is a docker problem because there is a
+1 (binding)
- Checked signature and checksum
- Ran the license check using docker run -it --rm -v
$(pwd):/github/workspace apache/skywalking-eyes header check
(I found this in the release.sh script)
- Verified .licenserc.yaml, LICENSE, and NOTICE
- Spot checked occurrences of ‘[
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature, license, note, ASF header
Ran build and test
Checked no unexpected binary files
Best,
Jack Ye
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked:
> - checksum and signature are correct
> - ASF headers are ther
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- checksum and signature are correct
- ASF headers are there (not in the tsv files but not a problem)
- no binary found in the source distribution
Good improvement for next releases: update NOTICE file to mention non
ASF dependencies (listed in DEPENDENCIES.rust.tsv) w
Hi, Daniel
> 1. I didn't find any docs on how to verify a release (just docs on how to run
> a release). This would be really helpful so that we know what the expected
> setup and steps.
> 2. The license/header checks I did somewhat manually. I also tried using the
> docker/skywalking-eyes, bu
>
> A couple things I noticed that might make the verification process go
> smoother:
> 1. I didn't find any docs on how to verify a release (just docs on how to
> run a release). This would be really helpful so that we know what the
> expected setup and steps.
> 2. The license/header checks I did
+1 (binding)
checked sigs/sums/license/build/tests
A couple things I noticed that might make the verification process go
smoother:
1. I didn't find any docs on how to verify a release (just docs on how to
run a release). This would be really helpful so that we know what the
expected setup and st
+1 non-binding.
[x] Download links are valid.
[ ] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 6:08 AM Amogh Jahagirdar wrote:
> +1 non-binding,
>
> Verified chec
+1 non-binding,
Verified checksum/signatures, license/notice files, ASF headers and ran
build and tests.
Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:52 AM Chojan Shang wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files
+1 non-binding
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source
On 2024/02/15 12:52:38 Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>
> T
+1
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source
Jan Kaul 于2024年2月16日周五 21:45写道：
> +1
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>
+1
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source
On 15.02.24 17:00, Xuanwo wrote:
+1 non-binding
So happy to get a v0.2.0 release!
[x] Download links a
+1 non-binding
So happy to get a v0.2.0 release!
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
gpg: Signature made Thu 15 Feb 2024 08:27:45 PM CST
gpg:using RSA key FCD3779E399C53D995FC82A35171BA3E54493550
gpg: Good signature from "Fokko Driesprong " [ultimate]
apac
Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg Rust version 0.2.0.
The tag to be voted on is 0.2.0-rc.1.
This first release provides integration with the REST catalog and a lot of
scaffolding that's needed for reading the data.
The release candidate:
15 matches
Mail list logo
