Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

Thanks everyone, We have (9 binding/4-non-binding) +1's and a quite a few approvals on the PR . Thanks for voting and suggestions/additions to the implementation note. Kind regards, Fokko Op di 25 feb 2025 om 18:50 schreef Matt Topol : > +1 (non-bin

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:49 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyon

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non binding) > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the >> current-snapshot-id, which led

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the current-snapshot-id, > which led to implementation notes in the spec. Thanks for the reviews so far > and to Daniel for the addition

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:31 AM Steven Wu wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:13 PM Péter Váry > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, 04:16 Steve Zhang >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (nb) >>> Thanks, >>> Steve Zhang >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2025, at 6:32 PM, Renjie Liu wrote: >>> >>> +

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:13 PM Péter Váry wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, 04:16 Steve Zhang > wrote: > >> +1 (nb) >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >> >> On Feb 24, 2025, at 6:32 PM, Renjie Liu wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:00 AM Szehon Ho >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, 04:16 Steve Zhang wrote: > +1 (nb) > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Feb 24, 2025, at 6:32 PM, Renjie Liu wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:00 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM rdb...@gmail.com >> wrote

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (nb) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Feb 24, 2025, at 6:32 PM, Renjie Liu wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:00 AM Szehon Ho > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM rdb...@gmail.com >> mailt

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:00 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 11:00 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gma

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 Thanks Szehon On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 11:00 AM Russell Spitzer >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM Fokko Driesprong >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 11:00 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM Fokko Driesprong >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Recently, there was confusion >>>

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 11:00 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Recently, there was confusion >> about >> valid values for the current-snapshot

[VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

Hi everyone, Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the current-snapshot-id, which led to implementation notes in the spec. Thanks for the reviews so far and to Daniel fo

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Recently, there was confusion > about > valid values for the current-snapshot-id, which led to implementation > notes