+1 Thanks Szehon
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 11:00 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> Recently, there was confusion >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/w403yzmpy9n9swcpwl2dcj2skdc0dskg> about >>>> valid values for the current-snapshot-id, which led to implementation >>>> notes <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12334> in the spec. >>>> Thanks for the reviews so far and to Daniel for the additional historical >>>> context on snapshot ID generation. Since there were a couple of >>>> reviews, and everything has been addressed, I would like to raise a vote to >>>> add this to the spec. >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add the implementation notes to the spec >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>
