Thanks everyone, We have (9 binding/4-non-binding) +1's and a quite a few approvals on the PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12334>. Thanks for voting and suggestions/additions to the implementation note.
Kind regards, Fokko Op di 25 feb 2025 om 18:50 schreef Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com>: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:49 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng > <hua...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non binding) >> > >> > Regards >> > JB >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the >> current-snapshot-id, which led to implementation notes in the spec. Thanks >> for the reviews so far and to Daniel for the additional historical context >> on snapshot ID generation. Since there were a couple of reviews, and >> everything has been addressed, I would like to raise a vote to add this to >> the spec. >> >> >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 Add the implementation notes to the spec >> >> [ ] +0 >> >> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Fokko >> >>
