Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

2025-04-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
We are good for 1.9.0 (already updated). Just wondering if we should consider 1.8.x or just move forward with 1.9. Le jeu. 3 avr. 2025 à 06:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi > > I guess we have to check the impact of > https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30065 and update if needed. >

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-04-04 Thread Ryan Blue
+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 PM Matt Topol wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef H

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-04-04 Thread Daniel Weeks
+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography > spec, we noticed some parts that can be sim

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Iceberg Go Release v0.2.0

2025-04-04 Thread Renjie Liu
Hi, Matt: Congratulations on the release. Just one reminder to update the the status page , and here is the doc file. On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:17 PM Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Mar

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

2025-04-04 Thread Renjie Liu
+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi wrote: > >> +1. >> >> Gang Wu 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Iceberg Go Release v0.2.0

2025-04-04 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Matt, Congratulations on the release, and thanks for following announcement protocols. Your announcement email must have a link to the downloads page so folks can directly access the new release. https://iceberg.apache.org/releases/ Warm regards, Craig > On Mar 26, 2025, at 12:26, Matt Topo

[DISCUSS] Change iceberg-cpp CI settings to only require approval for new contributors

2025-04-04 Thread Gang Wu
Hi, I am starting this thread to gather feedback for iceberg-cpp to only require approvals for new contributors. iceberg-cpp is still at its early stage and almost all contributors are new to the Iceberg community. Changing the CI setting makes it easier for people to collaborate. If there's cons

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

2025-04-04 Thread Alex Dutra
Hi Yuya, Thanks for reporting this issue, which is indeed a defect in the SigV4 auth manager. The fix was hopefully easy: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12582 Sorry for the inconvenience, Alex On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 5:20 AM Yuya Ebihara wrote: > S3 Tables tests in Trino with 1.9.0 n

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Iceberg Go v0.2.0 RC1

2025-04-04 Thread Kevin Liu
+1 (non-binding) Ran verification script `dev/release/verify_rc.sh 0.2.0 1`. Built and tested with the CLI against pyiceberg's integration tests catalog. Best, Kevin Liu On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:57 AM Matt Topol wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1)

Re: [DISCUSS] Multi-arg transforms

2025-04-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Fokko OK, I was focusing only on source-ids for V3 Writer, and the compatibility on the reader. Your proposal works as well (Writer V3 writes source-id or source-ids depending of the number of args), the Reader V3 also has to be updated to read source-id or source-ids (Reader V2 doesn't change)