+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng >>> <hua...@apple.com.invalid>: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette <bhule...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It >>>> looks like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched >>>> to using projjson:<identifier> where <identifier> points to a table >>>> property. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:45 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:30 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Makes sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi everyone, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > While working on the reference implementation for >>>>>>> Geometry/Geography spec, >>>>>>> > we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first >>>>>>> version: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > 1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT >>>>>>> serialization >>>>>>> > logic, for not many real world use cases) >>>>>>> > 2. JSON type serialization can be a json string, not a json >>>>>>> object. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to the V3 spec >>>>>>> to the >>>>>>> > geo types. The PR is: >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12533. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec >>>>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>>>> > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> > Szehon >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>
