Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (binding) Verified signatures, checksum, RAT checks. Ran build and test with JDK17 Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Checked signatures and checksum > - Checked license > - Full Build and Test > > Best regards, > Honah > > On Tue,

[Announce] Apache Iceberg Community Meeting in Austin, TX (Hybrid)

Hi Everyone, Please Join Cloudera and Snowflake for an Apache Iceberg™ Meetup In Austin TX! We’ll showcase the latest innovations around Apache Iceberg™ v3, REST Catalog, highlight a data practitioner’s implementation journey, and share how industry leaders are accelerating real time AI/ML with A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.0rc2

Hi everyone, We found a change in default behavior for the data file location in the new 0.9.0 release. The `ObjectStoreLocationProvider` was turned on by default whereas it was off and not available in previous versions. Previous versions will write to `data/` directory, whereas the new version w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.0rc2

+1 (binding) - Ran signatures/checksum/licenses checks - Ran tests locally (3.10) - Did some local testing Thanks for running this release Drew! Kind regards, Fokko Op di 25 feb 2025 om 07:20 schreef Kevin Liu : > +1 (non-binding) > > Downloaded from SVN > * gpg: Good signature from "

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (binding) - Checked signatures and checksum - Checked license - Full Build and Test Best regards, Honah On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:52 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 > Checked Sigs and Checksum > Ran Rat > Ran full build/test > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko > wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 Checked Sigs and Checksum Ran Rat Ran full build/test On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > +1 (binding) > >- Checked signatures and checksum >- Checked licenses >- Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schree

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:49 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyon

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non binding) > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the >> current-snapshot-id, which led

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (binding) - Checked signatures and checksum - Checked licenses - Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE Kind regards, Fokko Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schreef Kevin Liu : > +1 (non-binding) > > I followed "How to Verify a Release" >

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the current-snapshot-id, > which led to implementation notes in the spec. Thanks for the reviews so far > and to Daniel for the addition

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (non-binding) I followed "How to Verify a Release" . Checked out artifact from SVN, ``` svn checkout https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1/ . ``` Verified * Signature Good * Checksum Ok * RAT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (non binding) - Hash and checksum are good - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK in different distributed artifacts (source distribution, aws bundle, etc) - ASF header present in all expected files - No binary file found in the source distribution - Did quick smoke tests Thanks, Regards JB On Mon, Feb