Re: [discuss] Standardizing Naming Schemes for Language-Specific Configurations

We formalized some of the configurations in the REST spec . Still, I would be reluctant to try to create an exhaustive list of configuration options since it will be tough to m

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 I think this is an elegant solution, thanks for working on this Gabor! Kind regards, Fokko Op vr 24 jan 2025 om 21:31 schreef Honah J. : > +1, thanks Gabor! > > Best regards, > Honah > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 'd on the

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 Op za 25 jan 2025 om 00:55 schreef Honah J. : > +1, thanks for driving this! > > Best Regards, > Honah > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM Yufei Gu wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:15 PM Amo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg (java) 1.8.0 release

Added! +1 on the more frequent releases! Kind regards, Fokko Op za 25 jan 2025 om 02:01 schreef Dmitri Bourlatchkov : > Thanks for the clarification, Amogh! Much appreciated! > > Would you mind adding these PRs to the 1.9 milestone, please? > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11992 > htt

Re: [Discussion] Proposal for Iceberg Community Meetup Guidelines

Hi Kevin, I believe such a section is beneficial. I started planning a local event in Japan recently, but the recommended actions were unclear even though I read https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#community-guidelines. I have two questions: 1. Should we use @IcebergMeetup YouTube channel f

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg (java) 1.8.0 release

Thanks for the clarification, Amogh! Much appreciated! Would you mind adding these PRs to the 1.9 milestone, please? https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11992 https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11995 Thanks, Dmitri. On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 7:07 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg (java) 1.8.0 release

Hey all, Just following up here with a bit of a status update, so in the past week or so, items in the 1.8 release milestone have been closing out. I'm aiming to cut a release next Tuesday, Jan 28. I'd like to reiterate that for any changes that do

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1, thanks for driving this! Best Regards, Honah On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:15 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1 > Yufei > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:15 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> It corresponds to the spec (ini

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 Yufei On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:15 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> It corresponds to the spec (initial/write default values). >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Fr

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Add in ChangeLog Reserved Field IDs to Spec and Decrement Row Lineage Reserved IDs

Thanks for fixing this, Russell! +1 for keeping the changelog view related id as is, given the changelog view has been widely used. Yufei On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:35 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > We added reserved fields into the Apache Iceberg repo to use with > ChangeLog views but these wer

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > It corresponds to the spec (initial/write default values). > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:11 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > > > > Everyone, > > > > I'd like to hold a quick vote

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 (non binding) It corresponds to the spec (initial/write default values). Thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:11 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > > Everyone, > > I'd like to hold a quick vote for a small addition to the REST spec to > include the initial/write defaults introduced in v3 as

Re: [VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Dan! I double-checked that it aligns with V3 default value as described by the spec, https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/#default-values Best, Kevin Liu On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:14 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > Everyone, > > I'd like to hold a quick vote for a small addition to

Re: [VOTE] Document Snapshot Summary Optional Fields as Subsection of Appendix F in Spec

Thanks everyone for voting and discussing! This vote has passed with the following results: - +1 binding vote: 8 - +1 non-binding vote: 5 I will merge the spec change shorttly Best regards, Honah On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:58 AM Aihua Xu wrote: > +1 non-binding. > > On Wed, Jan 22, 202

[DISCUSS/VOTE] Add in ChangeLog Reserved Field IDs to Spec and Decrement Row Lineage Reserved IDs

We added reserved fields into the Apache Iceberg repo to use with ChangeLog views but these were never added to the spec. When Row Lineage was added, those IDs inadvertently collided with the ID's already set. In this PR I add in the ChangeLog

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1, thanks Gabor! Best regards, Honah On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :) > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks, Gabor! >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christia

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :) On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, Gabor! > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel < > christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! >> >> Daniel Weeks schri

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 Thanks, Gabor! On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel wrote: > +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! > > Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: >> >>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change >> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general >> cons

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change > during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general > consensus on the approach. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab > wrote: >

[VOTE] Add initial/write defaults to REST spec

Everyone, I'd like to hold a quick vote for a small addition to the REST spec to include the initial/write defaults introduced in v3 as optional fields to the table schema. PR: OpenAPI: add initial/write defaults to schema #12094 Thanks, Dan

Re: [Discussion] Proposal for Iceberg Community Meetup Guidelines

Hi Kevin Thanks for bringing this discussion. It's a good intention. As a reminder, at The ASF, we are very strict in the trademarks and brand use. You can find some resources here: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ and specifically for event: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#eve