+1

I think this is an elegant solution, thanks for working on this Gabor!

Kind regards,
Fokko

Op vr 24 jan 2025 om 21:31 schreef Honah J. <hon...@apache.org>:

> +1, thanks Gabor!
>
> Best regards,
> Honah
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :)
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Thanks, Gabor!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel <
>>> christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change
>>>>>> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general
>>>>>> consensus on the approach.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Iceberg Community,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a PR for changing the REST spec
>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11946/> as part of the
>>>>>>> freshness-aware table loading proposal. I feel that the spec part is
>>>>>>> something that the participants have agreed on so I think this is the 
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>> to start a vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Links:
>>>>>>> PR for changing REST spec
>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11946/> (this is the scope
>>>>>>> of the vote)
>>>>>>> Doc for freshness-aware table loading
>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rnVSP_iv2I47giwfAe-Z3DYhKkKwWCVvCkC9rEvtaLA>
>>>>>>> [DISCUSS] thread
>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/38hmhhd2y40mskmqm7pr20j0oo876d7t>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>>>>>> [ ] 0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not make these changes because...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Gabor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to