Hi Gyula, Tom
I appreciate that the details are a bit wooly – but what class of
incompatibility problems were you envisioning?
My first guess Is it that the operator maybe might start to put
annotations/labels etc on resources that then conflict with the native
integration?
That said – our re
Hi Gyula and Tom,
Thanks for your responses. We are not going to work on this in the very short
term , but it is now on our list to do,
Kind regards, David.
From: Gyula Fóra
Date: Tuesday, 8 July 2025 at 17:07
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Flink Kubenetes Operator
Hi David,
I had a conversation in the dim distant past about doing this and I remember
that the the main issue with the upgrade in the operator was that the main
Flink repo [1] had not upgraded yet and that there could be conflicts? However,
I am drawing a blank on the exact details.
+1 for w
Hi David!
I think we should definitely pick up the latest version if possible, we
have to make sure that this is compatible with how Flink uses the client
for native integration though.
Cheers
Gyula
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 6:02 PM David Radley wrote:
> Hi,
> I can see that the Flink operator us
