Hi David, I had a conversation in the dim distant past about doing this and I remember that the the main issue with the upgrade in the operator was that the main Flink repo [1] had not upgraded yet and that there could be conflicts? However, I am drawing a blank on the exact details.
+1 for working on this though it would be a good QoL improvement. Tom Cooper @tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/c7ab7cacf0fe1d7e7c89b16f9c45a524359e323b/flink-kubernetes/pom.xml#L34 On Tuesday, 8 July 2025 at 17:02, David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi, > I can see that the Flink operator uses the 6.13.2 Kubenetes client . We are > looking to move up to use 7.20 to pick up security fixes. I see > https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/blob/main/doc/MIGRATION-v7.md. > > Any thoughts on the impact and whether there is a community support for this > upgrade? > Kind regards, David. > > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
