Hi Gyula and Tom,
Thanks for your responses. We are not going to work on this in the very short
term , but it is now on our list to do,
Kind regards, David.
From: Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 8 July 2025 at 17:07
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Flink Kubenetes Operator client version
Hi David!
I think we should definitely pick up the latest version if possible, we
have to make sure that this is compatible with how Flink uses the client
for native integration though.
Cheers
Gyula
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 6:02 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi David,
I had a conversation in the dim distant past about doing this and I remember
that the the main issue with the upgrade in the operator was that the main
Flink repo [1] had not upgraded yet and that there could be conflicts? However,
I am drawing a blank on the exact details.
+1 for working on this though it would be a good QoL improvement.
Tom Cooper
@tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev
[1]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/c7ab7cacf0fe1d7e7c89b16f9c45a524359e323b/flink-kubernetes/pom.xml#L34
> Hi,
> I can see that the Flink operator uses the 6.13.2 Kubenetes client . We
> are looking to move up to use 7.20 to pick up security fixes. I see
> https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/blob/main/doc/MIGRATION-v7.md
> .
>
> Any thoughts on the impact and whether there is a community support for
> this upgrade?
> Kind regards, David.
>
>
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
>
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
