Thanks Robert.
Bowen, in the spirit of remaining neutral, I decided to put them in
alphabetical order.
Seth
> On Dec 20, 2019, at 3:34 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> I've assigned you to the ticket.
> You've convinced me that the "Deployment Model" thing was not a good idea.
>
>> On Fri, De
I've assigned you to the ticket.
You've convinced me that the "Deployment Model" thing was not a good idea.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 5:35 AM Bowen Li wrote:
> Really cool. I especially like the list of tags on "Ververica Platform"!
>
> BTW, why is "Ververica Platform" placed at the last? I won't
Really cool. I especially like the list of tags on "Ververica Platform"!
BTW, why is "Ververica Platform" placed at the last? I won't feel bothered
if we move it to the top.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 5:56 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> I'm not sure, I think most all the options other than EMR abstract
I'm not sure, I think most all the options other than EMR abstract that
component away.
I've also opened a ticket if a commiter could please assign it to my Jira:
sjwiesman
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15337
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:29 AM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I was actually
I was actually referring to "YARN", "Kubernetes", "Mesos".
If people know that AWS EMR is using YARN, they know which documentation to
look for in Flink.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:26 PM Konstantin Knauf
wrote:
> +1 This gives a better overview of the deployment targets and shows our
> prospecti
+1 This gives a better overview of the deployment targets and shows our
prospective users that they can rely on a broad set of vendors, if help is
needed.
I guess, Robert means if the vendor offers a managed service (like AWS
Kinesis Analytics), or licenses software (like Ververica Platform). This
Happy to see there seems to be a consensus.
Robert, can you elaborate on what you mean by "deployment model"?
Seth
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:19 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> +1 to the general idea
>
> Maybe we could add "Deployment Model" in addition to "Supported
> Environments" as properties f
+1 to the general idea
Maybe we could add "Deployment Model" in addition to "Supported
Environments" as properties for the vendors.
I'd say Cloudera, Eventador and Huawei [1] are missing from this page
[1]https://www.huaweicloud.com/en-us/product/cs.html
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:05 PM Stephan E
+1 for your proposed solution, Seth!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Thanks for continuing this discussion Seth. I like the mockup and I think
> this is a good improvement. Modulo the completeness check, +1 for offering
> links to 3rd party integrations.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
Thanks for continuing this discussion Seth. I like the mockup and I think
this is a good improvement. Modulo the completeness check, +1 for offering
links to 3rd party integrations.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> This discussion is a follow up to the previous
10 matches
Mail list logo
