By the way: I have disabled the test in the Hadoop 2.4.1 build, so my
original problem is resolved.
I'm not convinced that posting on the user@ ml is the right approach.
The last few questions to the user@ list asking for feedback have not
really been answered. I believe that we have deprecated th
Thanks Robert for all this,
I think that we should also post a thread in the user ML so that users
can also comment on the topic.
What do you think?
Kostas
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:27 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your feedback.
>
> I will try to fix the test then (or disabl
Thank you all for your feedback.
I will try to fix the test then (or disable it).
Here's a ticket for dropping the BucketingSink:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16616 Please mark whatever we
consider necessary as a "depends on" ticket.
@David / @Seth: Where are the tickets depending
+1 to drop it.
To Jingsong :
we are planning to implement the orc StreamingFileSink in 1.11.
I think users also could reference the old BucktSink from the old version.
Best,
Guowei
Jingsong Li 于2020年3月13日周五 上午10:07写道：
> Hi Robert,
>
> +1 to drop it but maybe not 1.11.
>
> ORC has not been sup
Thanks for bringing up this discussion Robert!
According to the inputs, I suggest we create an umbrella JIRA issue to
track all critical improvements StreamingFileSink should have before we
could completely discard bucketing sink, so we could have a clear view of
the progress and how soon we could
Hi
+1 to drop bucketing sink
FLIP-115 also needs to be prioritized for 1.11
在 2020/3/13 上午10:07，“Jingsong Li” 写入:
Hi Robert,
+1 to drop it but maybe not 1.11.
ORC has not been supported on StreamingFileSink. I have seen lots of users
run ORC in the bucketing sink.
Hi Robert,
+1 to drop it but maybe not 1.11.
ORC has not been supported on StreamingFileSink. I have seen lots of users
run ORC in the bucketing sink.
Best,
Jingsong Lee
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:11 AM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> Sorry, I meant FLIP-46.
>
> Seth
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:52 AM
Sorry, I meant FLIP-46.
Seth
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:52 AM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> I agree with David, I think FLIP-49 needs to be prioritized for 1.11 if we
> want to drop the bucketing sink.
>
> Seth
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM David Anderson
> wrote:
>
>> The BucketingSink is stil
I agree with David, I think FLIP-49 needs to be prioritized for 1.11 if we
want to drop the bucketing sink.
Seth
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM David Anderson wrote:
> The BucketingSink is still somewhat widely used, I think in part because of
> shortcomings in the StreamingFileSink.
>
> I wo
The BucketingSink is still somewhat widely used, I think in part because of
shortcomings in the StreamingFileSink.
I would hope that in tandem with removing the bucketing sink we could also
address some of these issues. I'm thinking in particular of issues that are
waiting on FLIP-46 [1].
Removin
Thanks for driving this discussion, Robert!
This e2e test really fails frequently. +1 to drop bucketing sink, it is not
worth paying more efforts since deprecated.
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Jeff Zhang
Send Time:2020 Mar. 12 (Thu.)
Good idea! +1 for dropping the BucketingSink.
Best,
Hequn
> On Mar 12, 2020, at 10:40 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently investigating a failing end to end test for the bucketing
> sink [1].
> The bucketing sink has been deprecated in the 1.9 release [2], because we
> have
+1
Aljoscha
+1， dropping deprecated api is always necessary for a sustainable project.
Kostas Kloudas 于2020年3月12日周四 下午11:06写道：
> Hi Robert,
>
> +1 for dropping the BucketingSink.
> In any case, it has not been maintained for quite some time.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:41 PM Robert Me
Hi Robert,
+1 for dropping the BucketingSink.
In any case, it has not been maintained for quite some time.
Cheers,
Kostas
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:41 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently investigating a failing end to end test for the bucketing
> sink [1].
> The bucketing sin
15 matches
Mail list logo
