+1 to drop it.

To Jingsong :
we are planning to implement the orc StreamingFileSink in 1.11.
I think users also could reference the old BucktSink from the old version.

Best,
Guowei


Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 上午10:07写道:

> Hi Robert,
>
> +1 to drop it but maybe not 1.11.
>
> ORC has not been supported on StreamingFileSink. I have seen lots of users
> run ORC in the bucketing sink.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:11 AM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I meant FLIP-46.
> >
> > Seth
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:52 AM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with David, I think FLIP-49 needs to be prioritized for 1.11 if
> > we
> > > want to drop the bucketing sink.
> > >
> > > Seth
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM David Anderson <da...@ververica.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The BucketingSink is still somewhat widely used, I think in part
> because
> > >> of
> > >> shortcomings in the StreamingFileSink.
> > >>
> > >> I would hope that in tandem with removing the bucketing sink we could
> > also
> > >> address some of these issues. I'm thinking in particular of issues
> that
> > >> are
> > >> waiting on FLIP-46 [1].
> > >>
> > >> Removing the bucketing sink will go down better, in my opinion, if
> it's
> > >> coupled with progress on some of the open StreamingFileSink tickets.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-46%3A+Graceful+Shutdown+Handling+by+UDFs
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:27 PM Zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > >> .invalid>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks for driving this discussion, Robert!
> > >> >
> > >> > This e2e test really fails frequently.  +1 to drop bucketing sink,
> it
> > is
> > >> > not worth paying more efforts since deprecated.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Zhijiang
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > From:Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
> > >> > Send Time:2020 Mar. 12 (Thu.) 23:17
> > >> > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Bucketing Sink
> > >> >
> > >> > +1, dropping deprecated api is always necessary for a sustainable
> > >> project.
> > >> >
> > >> > Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月12日周四 下午11:06写道:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Robert,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +1 for dropping the BucketingSink.
> > >> > > In any case, it has not been maintained for quite some time.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Cheers,
> > >> > > Kostas
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:41 PM Robert Metzger <
> rmetz...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'm currently investigating a failing end to end test for the
> > >> bucketing
> > >> > > > sink [1].
> > >> > > > The bucketing sink has been deprecated in the 1.9 release [2],
> > >> because
> > >> > we
> > >> > > > have the new StreamingFileSink [3] for quite a while.
> > >> > > > Before putting any effort into fixing the end to end test for
> the
> > >> > sink, I
> > >> > > > wanted to propose dropping the bucketing sink from master for
> the
> > >> > > upcoming
> > >> > > > 1.11 release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > What do you think?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16227
> > >> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13396
> > >> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9749
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Best Regards
> > >> >
> > >> > Jeff Zhang
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>

Reply via email to