+1 for Scala as a default. Looks much less verbose.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Márton Balassi wrote:
> Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
>> +1 for Scala :-)
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márto
+1 for Scala
2015-03-09 15:34 GMT+01:00 Márton Balassi :
> Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Scala :-)
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm strong
Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1 for Scala :-)
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi
> wrote:
>
> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
> default
> > - thus ma
+1 for Scala :-)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi
wrote:
> I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a default
> - thus making the shorter page the default.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > I think either way is fine as long as
I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a default
- thus making the shorter page the default.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
>
> I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
>
> On Sat
I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java (see
> the Programming Guide
> <
> http://ci.apa
