Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for Scala :-) > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a > default > > - thus making the shorter page the default. > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent. > > > > > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default. > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckone...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is > Java > > > (see > > > > the Programming Guide > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html > > > > >), > > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming > > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>) > > Scala > > > is > > > > the default. I think it should be consistent. > > > > > > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source > codes, > > > but > > > > Java is more widely used. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala > > > docs) > > > > with Marton. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gabor > > > > > > > > > >
