+1 for Scala as a default. Looks much less verbose.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this. > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 for Scala :-) >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a >> default >> > - thus making the shorter page the default. >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent. >> > > >> > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default. >> > > >> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckone...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hey all, >> > > > >> > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is >> Java >> > > (see >> > > > the Programming Guide >> > > > < >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html >> > > > >), >> > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming >> > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>) >> > Scala >> > > is >> > > > the default. I think it should be consistent. >> > > > >> > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source >> codes, >> > > but >> > > > Java is more widely used. >> > > > >> > > > What do you think? >> > > > >> > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429 >> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala >> > > docs) >> > > > with Marton. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Gabor >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
