Date: Tuesday, 8 July 2025 at 07:07
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP Connector
to Flink
voila: https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-http/tree/main
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:49 AM Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hey,
>
> @Ser
larification could be along the lines of - If any member of the
>> PMC thinks that a Flip is sufficiently disruptive, they should propose that
>> the 2/3s majority be used. Would this help?
>>
>> Kind regards, David.
>>
>> From: Sergey Nuyanzin
>> Date:
gt; From: Sergey Nuyanzin
> Date: Monday, 7 July 2025 at 09:21
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP
> Connector to Flink
> Hi Robert and David
>
> Thank you for your clarifications.
>
> I'm not going to blo
: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP Connector
to Flink
Hi Robert and David
Thank you for your clarifications.
I'm not going to block or veto it, I have just raised a concern that
from one side there is an example with CDC connectors and from another
HTTP connector and the
t; From: Robert Metzger
> Date: Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 07:27
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP
> Connector to Flink
> Hey Sergey,
>
> I thought about this question as well, but in my opinion, a regular 3
> bindin
r many use
cases as-is.
Kind regards, David.
From: Robert Metzger
Date: Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 07:27
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP Connector
to Flink
Hey Sergey,
I thought about this question as well, but in my opinion,
+1 for Robert’s point.
Best,
Leonard
> 2025 7月 3 14:26，Robert Metzger 写道：
>
> a regular 3
> binding PMC vote is sufficient here:
Hey Sergey,
I thought about this question as well, but in my opinion, a regular 3
binding PMC vote is sufficient here:
The description of a new codebase adoption is:
> Adoption of large existing external codebase. This refers to contributions
> big enough that potentially change the shape and di
Thank you for your volunteering here David
I don't want to be a devil's advocate however I'm not sure we can
consider it as a regular FLIP and accepted.
The reason I think this way is the current Flink Bylaws[1] and
especially telling that in case of "Adoption of New Codebase"
we need to achieve 2
