voila: https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-http/tree/main
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:49 AM Robert Metzger <metrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > > @Sergey: Thanks for your message. Which other HTTP connector are you > referring to? > Changing the bylaws requires a 2/3 majority. We can clarify the wording > next time we need to make changes (I left a comment on that page). > > @David: I will create the repo now > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:04 AM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Sergey, >> Thanks for your thoughts on this. >> >> I guess we could go some sort of retrospective to understand how >> consistently the 2/3 majority was applied. >> It is probably better to clarify the words – as you suggest. My take is >> we should look to have the minimal admin and process to get things through >> in a timely manner; where this is not appropriate is when some proposal >> fundamentally changes Flink – these changes need proper consideration, and >> the 2/3 majority would apply. I suggest the 2/3 majority should only be >> used when necessary and should not be overused. >> >> Maybe a clarification could be along the lines of - If any member of the >> PMC thinks that a Flip is sufficiently disruptive, they should propose that >> the 2/3s majority be used. Would this help? >> >> Kind regards, David. >> >> From: Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> >> Date: Monday, 7 July 2025 at 09:21 >> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP >> Connector to Flink >> Hi Robert and David >> >> Thank you for your clarifications. >> >> I'm not going to block or veto it, I have just raised a concern that >> from one side there is an example with CDC connectors and from another >> HTTP connector and they are handled differently. >> >> If you think it is ok, I'm fine with it. >> >> Maybe then we should add more clarifications about that in Flink >> bylaws or some other place? >> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 6:34 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Sergey and Robert, >> > In the Community Health Initiative workgroup we had discussed this and >> Robert mentioned his line of thinking that this would need 3 votes rather >> than the 2/3s of PMC. >> > I agree with Robert when he says : >> > >> > I don't think a new connector changes the shape and direction of the >> > project ? >> > It's "just" a major change, requiring a FLIP. >> > >> > Saying that, we have only received support this Flip. I would love to >> hear any specific concerns about this connector. It is not perfect and >> could be more complete and will be further enhanced, but is it a big value >> add for many use cases as-is. >> > Kind regards, David. >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >> > Date: Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 07:27 >> > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> >> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP >> Connector to Flink >> > Hey Sergey, >> > >> > I thought about this question as well, but in my opinion, a regular 3 >> > binding PMC vote is sufficient here: >> > >> > The description of a new codebase adoption is: >> > >> > > Adoption of large existing external codebase. This refers to >> contributions >> > > big enough that potentially change the shape and direction of the >> project >> > > with massive restructuring and future maintenance commitment. >> > >> > >> > I don't think a new connector changes the shape and direction of the >> > project ? >> > It's "just" a major change, requiring a FLIP. >> > >> > For me, the biggest concern with any new connector will be the lack of >> an >> > active community around it. People willing to fix, review, release >> stuff. >> > However, I did not bring this up, since two companies (IBM, GetInData) >> seem >> > to be actively using it, and the GH community is fairly active. >> > I understand the desire of companies to make contributions to >> repositories >> > that are maintained by an independent organization (Apache), instead of >> a >> > company (GetInData), that's why I support this FLIP. >> > If you feel otherwise, you as a PMC member have the power to stop this >> > effort, if you think it requires further discussion in the PMC. >> > >> > Best, >> > Robert >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 8:17 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Thank you for your volunteering here David >> > > >> > > I don't want to be a devil's advocate however I'm not sure we can >> > > consider it as a regular FLIP and accepted. >> > > The reason I think this way is the current Flink Bylaws[1] and >> > > especially telling that in case of "Adoption of New Codebase" >> > > we need to achieve 2/3 majority of votes in order to accept it. The >> > > similar thing happened while accepting CDC Flink connectors [3]. >> > > Also binding votes in this cases are considered not the same way as >> > > for regular FLIPs >> > > >> > > Please correct me if I'm wrong >> > > >> > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws >> > > [2] >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026#FlinkBylaws-Actions >> > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sq5w21tcomrmb025tl820cxty9l0z26w >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 3:48 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi devs, >> > > > >> > > > The vote[1] on FLIP-532[2] concluded with the following results: >> > > > >> > > > Approving(+1) votes: >> > > > >> > > > Ferenc Csaky (binding) >> > > > Gyula Fora (binding) >> > > > Leonard Xu (binding) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > PoorVank Bhatia (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Sharath (non-binding) >> > > > Nic Townsend (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Lajith Koova (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Tom Cooper (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Mark Nuttall (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Anu K T (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Mehdi Deboub (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Ammu P (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > Sebastien Pereira (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > There were 3 binding, 10 non-binding and no disproving(-1) votes. >> > > > >> > > > I'm happy to announce that FLIP-532 has been approved. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > David >> > > > >> > > > [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ft7cw2cy7g5cj3hyx6l9r1twnoy0wr0q >> > > [2] >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-532%3A+Donate+GetInData+HTTP+Connector+to+Flink >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Unless otherwise stated above: >> > > > >> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited >> > > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 >> > > > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park >> Road, >> > > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Best regards, >> > > Sergey >> > > >> > >> > Unless otherwise stated above: >> > >> > IBM United Kingdom Limited >> > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 >> > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, >> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Sergey >> >> Unless otherwise stated above: >> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited >> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 >> Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, >> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN >> >
