Hi devs,
I'm happy to announce that FLIP-141[1] is officially approved.
The vote [2] has been opened for more than 72h + weekends, and we have
received 9 +1s, 8 of which are binding, and no vetos. Thanks everyone for
participating.
* Xintong (binding)
* Till (binding)
* Dian (binding)
* Zhu (bin
Thanks everyone,
I'm closing this vote now in a separate email.
Concerning the naming, I will use DATAPROC, as @Stephan suggested in the
discussion thread [1], for now. If there are any other opinions, feel free
to reach out to me anytime before the release.
Thank you~
Xintong Song
[1]
http:/
For the option name, maybe:
*flink.main*
or
*flink.managed* (this may be a bit confusing for existing users as we said
that the overall managed memory is managed by Flink)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:56 AM Andrey Zagrebin wrote:
> +1
>
> Best,
> Andrey
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:16 PM Yu Li wrot
+1
Best,
Andrey
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:16 PM Yu Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 17:03, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > We just need to make sure to find a good name before the release but
> > shouldn't block any work on this.
> >
> > Aljoscha
> >
>
+1
Best Regards,
Yu
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 17:03, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> +1
>
> We just need to make sure to find a good name before the release but
> shouldn't block any work on this.
>
> Aljoscha
>
> On 08.09.20 07:59, Xintong Song wrote:
> > Thanks for the vote, @Jincheng.
> >
> >
> > Con
+1
We just need to make sure to find a good name before the release but
shouldn't block any work on this.
Aljoscha
On 08.09.20 07:59, Xintong Song wrote:
Thanks for the vote, @Jincheng.
Concerning the namings, the original idea was, as you suggested, to have
separate configuration names fo
Thanks for the vote, @Jincheng.
Concerning the namings, the original idea was, as you suggested, to have
separate configuration names for batch and rocksdb while only one of them
will take effect at a time.
It was then in the discussion thread [1] that @Stepahn suggested to combine
these two.
+1 for the proposal!
Regarding the name of `BATCH_OP/ROCKSDB`, we can reserve the configuration
names for batch and rocksdb respectively, ` batch_ OP` for batch, "ROCKSDB"
for roockdb. and the default value as follows:
{
BATCH_OP: 70,
ROCKSDB : 70,
PYTHON : 30
}
Only one of `BATCH_ O
Thanks for the votes.
Concerning the name for batch/RocksDB memory consumer, how about "execution
memory"?
We can further explain in docs and config option description that this is
used for job execution, which is currently dedicated to rocksdb in
streaming and batch algorithms in batch.
Thank yo
+1
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:54 AM Zhu Zhu wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> Dian Fu 于2020年9月7日周一 上午10:34写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > > 在 2020年9月3日，下午8:46，Till Rohrmann 写道：
> > >
> > > Hi Xintong,
> > >
> > > thanks for starting the vote.
> > >
> > > +1 for the proposal given that w
+1
Thanks,
Zhu
Dian Fu 于2020年9月7日周一 上午10:34写道：
> +1
>
> > 在 2020年9月3日，下午8:46，Till Rohrmann 写道：
> >
> > Hi Xintong,
> >
> > thanks for starting the vote.
> >
> > +1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the
> > different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer)
+1
> 在 2020年9月3日，下午8:46，Till Rohrmann 写道：
>
> Hi Xintong,
>
> thanks for starting the vote.
>
> +1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the
> different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer) and
> their corresponding weights.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Thu
Hi Xintong,
thanks for starting the vote.
+1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the
different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer) and
their corresponding weights.
Cheers,
Till
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM Xintong Song wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like
Hi devs,
I'd like to start a voting thread on FLIP-141[1], which proposes how
managed memory should be shared by various use cases within a slot. The
proposal has been discussed in [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72h + weekends. I'll try to close it on
September 8, unless there is an obje
14 matches
Mail list logo
