+1

Best,
Yangze Guo

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:54 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月7日周一 上午10:34写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > 在 2020年9月3日,下午8:46,Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道:
> > >
> > > Hi Xintong,
> > >
> > > thanks for starting the vote.
> > >
> > > +1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the
> > > different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer) and
> > > their corresponding weights.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi devs,
> > >>
> > >> I'd like to start a voting thread on FLIP-141[1], which proposes how
> > >> managed memory should be shared by various use cases within a slot. The
> > >> proposal has been discussed in [2].
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72h + weekends. I'll try to close it
> > on
> > >> September 8, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you~
> > >>
> > >> Xintong Song
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-141%3A+Intra-Slot+Managed+Memory+Sharing#FLIP141:IntraSlotManagedMemorySharing-compatibility
> > >>
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> > >>
> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-141-Intra-Slot-Managed-Memory-Sharing-td44146.html
> > >>
> >
> >

Reply via email to