Thanks for the votes. Concerning the name for batch/RocksDB memory consumer, how about "execution memory"? We can further explain in docs and config option description that this is used for job execution, which is currently dedicated to rocksdb in streaming and batch algorithms in batch.
Thank you~ Xintong Song On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:43 AM Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Yangze Guo > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:54 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Zhu > > > > Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月7日周一 上午10:34写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > 在 2020年9月3日，下午8:46，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： > > > > > > > > Hi Xintong, > > > > > > > > thanks for starting the vote. > > > > > > > > +1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the > > > > different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer) > and > > > > their corresponding weights. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi devs, > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to start a voting thread on FLIP-141[1], which proposes how > > > >> managed memory should be shared by various use cases within a slot. > The > > > >> proposal has been discussed in [2]. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72h + weekends. I'll try to > close it > > > on > > > >> September 8, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. > > > >> > > > >> Thank you~ > > > >> > > > >> Xintong Song > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-141%3A+Intra-Slot+Managed+Memory+Sharing#FLIP141:IntraSlotManagedMemorySharing-compatibility > > > >> > > > >> [2] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-141-Intra-Slot-Managed-Memory-Sharing-td44146.html > > > >> > > > > > > >
