回复：[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
：2017年10月18日(星期三) 22:54收件人：Till Rohrmann 抄　送：dev ; Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) 主　题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 Hi Zhijiang! The proposal is to release 1.4 asap and have the master switch so 1.5 soon (early November or so). Merge the network code directly after that - the 1.5 release would come

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Stephan Ewen
into 1.4 ASAP. >> ----------发件人：Aljoscha >> Krettek 发送时间：2017年10月18日(星期三) 03:04收件人：dev < >> dev@flink.apache.org>主 题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 >> It seems we all agree on the general plan. Now we have to t

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Till Rohrmann
I went through the list of blocking issues and thinned it down to 25 open blockers and 12 in progress blockers. Please object if you don't agree with a specific issue. If not, then I suggest that we should concentrate on fixing these issues. Cheers, Till On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Stefan R

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Stefan Richter
I think this is a good plan. +1 from me. > Am 13.10.2017 um 17:49 schrieb Till Rohrmann : > > Hi all, > > I want to revive the discussion about releasing Flink 1.4 [1] and the set > of features to include. > > The gist of the previous discussion was that we postponed the feature > freeze for 1

回复：[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
1.4.0. I think we > >>>> can only release 1.4.0 if there are 0 (zero) unresolved issues with > >>>> fixVersion 1.4.0. > >>>> > >>>>> On 14. Oct 2017, at 07:34, Alexandru Gutan  > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Till Rohrmann
and verified the good performance.If needed, I will try to submit the > related PRs after network stack merged into 1.4 ASAP. > --发件人：Aljoscha > Krettek 发送时间：2017年10月18日(星期三) 03:04收件人：dev < > dev@flink.apache.org>主 题：Re: [DIS

回复：[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-18 Thread Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
good performance.If needed, I will try to submit the related PRs after network stack merged into 1.4 ASAP. --发件人：Aljoscha Krettek 发送时间：2017年10月18日(星期三) 03:04收件人：dev 主　题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 It seems we all agree on the

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-17 Thread Hai Zhou
Cool!!! Very much looking forward flink 1.4. Cheers, Hai Zhou > 在 2017年10月18日，03:04，Aljoscha Krettek 写道： > > Cool!!!

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-17 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
;>>>> great >>>>> >>>>> On 13 October 2017 at 18:02, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < >>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> totally agree with the way.-- >>>>&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-16 Thread Piotr Nowojski
at 18:02, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < >>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> totally agree with the way.-- >>>>> 发件人：Stephan Ewen < >>> se...@apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-16 Thread Eron Wright
< > > > wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > > > > > >> totally agree with the way.-- > > >> ----发件人：Stephan Ewen < > > se...@apache.org > > >>> 发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-16 Thread Fabian Hueske
at > > > > On 13 October 2017 at 18:02, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < > > wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > > > >> totally agree with the way.-- > >> 发件人：Stephan Ewen < > se...@apache.o

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-16 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
-发件人：Stephan Ewen >> 发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人：dev@flink.apache.org 主 >> 题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 >> I am in favor of doing this, if we can set it up in the following way. >> >> - We put out the 1.4 release now, as Ti

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Alexandru Gutan
great On 13 October 2017 at 18:02, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > totally agree with the way.-- > 发件人：Stephan Ewen >发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人：dev@flink.apache.org 主 > 题：Re: [

Re: 回复：[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Bowen Li
h the > way.--发件人：Stephan > Ewen 发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人：dev@flink.apache.org > 主　题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 > I am in favor of doing this, if we can set it up in the following way. > > - We put out the 1.4 release now, as Till and Aljoscha su

回复：[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
totally agree with the way.--发件人：Stephan Ewen 发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人：dev@flink.apache.org 主　题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 I am in favor of doing this, if we can set it up in the following way.   - We put out the 1.4

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Stephan Ewen
I am in favor of doing this, if we can set it up in the following way. - We put out the 1.4 release now, as Till and Aljoscha suggested. A stable cut before the fundamental changes go in. - We merge the very big changes (FLIP-6, Network stack, localized state restore, etc). directly (or very

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
+1 Excellent I'd like to volunteer as release manager. I already set up a Kanban board to monitor the open blocking (and non-blocking) issues for 1.4, though this is independent of me volunteering as release manager. We should all go over these issues and see which ones should actually be block

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Renjie Liu
Cool!!! On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM Till Rohrmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to revive the discussion about releasing Flink 1.4 [1] and the set > of features to include. > > The gist of the previous discussion was that we postponed the feature > freeze for 1.4 in order to include some more

[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4

2017-10-13 Thread Till Rohrmann
Hi all, I want to revive the discussion about releasing Flink 1.4 [1] and the set of features to include. The gist of the previous discussion was that we postponed the feature freeze for 1.4 in order to include some more features which were being developed. By now, we have completed a good set of