OK, sounds good to me. We have a couple of bugs to fix for the Table API / SQL but have PRs for most of them.
There's only one major issue that I'd like to include in 1.4.0 which is a refactoring of the TableSource interface. This effort has already started and is currently waiting for reviews / comments. I'm quite confident that we can get it in within the next two weeks. Cheers, Fabian 2017-10-16 10:22 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>: > @Bowen I started marking essential stuff as blocking (with fixVersion > 1.4.0). You're right, that we should start moving things to 1.5.0 that are > not blocking and that we don't think will make it into 1.4.0. I think we > can only release 1.4.0 if there are 0 (zero) unresolved issues with > fixVersion 1.4.0. > > > On 14. Oct 2017, at 07:34, Alexandru Gutan <alex.guta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > great > > > > On 13 October 2017 at 18:02, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < > > wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > > > >> totally agree with the way.-------------------------- > >> ----------------------------------------发件人：Stephan Ewen < > se...@apache.org > >>> 发送时间：2017年10月13日(星期五) 21:29收件人：dev@flink.apache.org < > dev@flink.apache.org>主 > >> 题：Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.4 > >> I am in favor of doing this, if we can set it up in the following way. > >> > >> - We put out the 1.4 release now, as Till and Aljoscha suggested. A > >> stable cut before the fundamental changes go in. > >> > >> - We merge the very big changes (FLIP-6, Network stack, localized state > >> restore, etc). directly (or very soon) after. > >> - We try to stabilize these changes and release 1.5 asap after that. > >> Ideally Around end of year or so. > >> > >> The reason I am bringing this up is that I know various users waiting > very > >> much for FLIP-6 and Network Stack enhancements. Given that these issues > >> were flagged for release 1.4, the users were planning to have them > rather > >> soon. > >> > >> Stephan > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 Excellent > >>> > >>> I'd like to volunteer as release manager. I already set > >> up a Kanban board > >>> to monitor the open blocking (and non-blocking) issues > >> for 1.4, though this > >>> is independent of me volunteering as release manager. We > >> should all go over > >>> these issues and see which ones should actually be blockin > >> g and which ones > >>> are not yet on that list. > >>> > >>>> On 13. Oct 2017, at 12:24, Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Cool!!! > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I want to revive the discussion about releasing Flink 1.4 [1] and the > >>> set > >>>>> of features to include. > >>>>> > >>>>> The gist of the previous discussion was that we postponed the feature > >>>>> freeze for 1.4 in order to include some more features w > >> hich were being > >>>>> developed. By now, we have completed a good set of features such as > >>> exactly > >>>>> once Kafka producer, reduced dependency footprint, Hado > >> op-free Flink and > >>>>> many bug fixes. I believe that these features will > >> make good release and > >>>>> users are already waiting for them. > >>>>> > >>>>> Some of the other features which we wanted to include, > >> mainly Flip-6, to > >>>>> some extent the network stack enhancements and the state decoupling > >>> still > >>>>> need some more time. Since these features are major > >> changes to Flink's > >>>>> runtime, it would be in my opinion a good idea to cut a > >> stable release > >>> with > >>>>> the above-mentioned feature set now and give the engine > >> features a bit > >>> more > >>>>> time to ripen and be properly tested. > >>>>> > >>>>> Therefore, I would actually be in favour of aiming for > >> a quick release > >>>>> meaning that we now concentrate mainly on fixing bugs and critical > >>> issues. > >>>>> Moreover, I'm optimistic that the delayed features will be completed > >>> soon > >>>>> such that we can deliver them with the next release. Wh > >> at do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > >>>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3. > >>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Flink-1-4-and-time-based-release-td19331.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Till > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Liu, Renjie > >>>> Software Engineer, MVAD > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
