gt; > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all, thanks for launching this discussion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > About eliminating Google Docs. I agree with Zhijiang, I share
> my
> > > > > concern
> > > > > > &
gt; > > discussions are in ML, It's going to be very messy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I think can keep this principle:
> > > > > > - Small issues can be discussed on Google doc.
> > > > > > - Big issues, or fundamental d
; > ML.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Jingsong Lee
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:22 AM Zhijiang <
> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > > > > .invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for launc
ing this discussion and also agree with the
> opinions
> > > of
> > > > > Kostas, Timo and Aljoscha.
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposed reasons for eliminating google doc are very
> reasonable,
> > > > > especially the access
formal must procedure to follow
> firstly.
> > > > And we can also kindly list these specific considerations/reasons
> > > > for google doc concerns as said below in the guideline doc.
> > > >
> > > > To do so, we still retain this option for
google doc concerns as said below in the guideline doc.
> > >
> > > To do so, we still retain this option for some people who prefer to
> > google
> > > doc or willing to provide it in some corner cases.
> > > Of course I am also happy to eliminate google doc completely.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Zhijiang
> > &
ogle
> > doc or willing to provide it in some corner cases.
> > Of course I am also happy to eliminate google doc completely.
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhijiang
> >
> >
> > --
> > From:Kostas Kloudas
> > Send Time:2020 Feb. 18 (
minate google doc completely.
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> --
> From:Kostas Kloudas
> Send Time:2020 Feb. 18 (Tue.) 23:03
> To:dev
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Improvements on FLIP Process
>
> +1 to what Aljoscha and Timo are proposing.
>
> I would lean towards eliminating Google Docs
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Improvements on FLIP Process
+1 to what Aljoscha and Timo are proposing.
I would lean towards eliminating Google Docs altogether.
I think they served a purpose when discussions were among 3 to 4
people but with the current size of the community and the amount of
+1 to what Aljoscha and Timo are proposing.
I would lean towards eliminating Google Docs altogether.
I think they served a purpose when discussions were among 3 to 4
people but with the current size of the community and the amount of
participants per discussion they become difficult to follow.
Be
+1 to what Aljoscha said.
The past has shown that discussions in Google docs do not reach all
interested parties and the tracability of design decisions becomes
difficult. Google services are also partially inaccessible in certain
parts of world.
We should actually do the opposite and not al
Hi,
thanks for starting this discussion!
However, I have a somewhat opposing opinion to this: we should disallow
using Google Docs for FLIPs and FLIP discussions and follow the already
established process more strictly.
My reasons for this are:
- discussions on the Google Doc are not reflec
Hi everyone,
Currently, when we create a FLIP we follow the FLIP process in the Flink
Improvement Proposals wiki[1]. The process mainly includes the following
steps:
1. Create a FLIP wiki page.
2. Raise the discussion on the mailing list.
3. Once the proposal is finalized, call a vote to have the
13 matches
Mail list logo
